TY - JOUR
T1 - A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury
T2 - Recommendations on the Type and Timing of Rehabilitation
AU - Fehlings, Michael G.
AU - Tetreault, Lindsay A.
AU - Aarabi, Bizhan
AU - Anderson, Paul
AU - Arnold, Paul M.
AU - Brodke, Darrel S.
AU - Chiba, Kazuhiro
AU - Dettori, Joseph R.
AU - Furlan, Julio C.
AU - Harrop, James S.
AU - Hawryluk, Gregory
AU - Holly, Langston T.
AU - Howley, Susan
AU - Jeji, Tara
AU - Kalsi-Ryan, Sukhvinder
AU - Kotter, Mark
AU - Kurpad, Shekar
AU - Kwon, Brian K.
AU - Marino, Ralph J.
AU - Martin, Allan R.
AU - Massicotte, Eric
AU - Merli, Geno
AU - Middleton, James W.
AU - Nakashima, Hiroaki
AU - Nagoshi, Narihito
AU - Palmieri, Katherine
AU - Singh, Anoushka
AU - Skelly, Andrea C.
AU - Tsai, Eve C.
AU - Vaccaro, Alexander
AU - Wilson, Jefferson R.
AU - Yee, Albert
AU - Burns, Anthony S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by AOSpine, the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation (ONF) and the AANS/CNS Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Dr Fehlings wishes to acknowledge support from the Gerald and Tootsie Halbert Chair in Neural Repair and Regeneration and the DeZwirek Family Foundation. Dr Tetreault acknowledges support from a Krembil Postdoctoral Fellowship Award. Methodological support was provided by Spectrum Research, Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Introduction: The objective of this study is to develop guidelines that outline the appropriate type and timing of rehabilitation in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address key questions related to rehabilitation in patients with acute SCI. A multidisciplinary guideline development group used this information, and their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the type and timing of rehabilitation. Based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), a strong recommendation is worded as “we recommend,” whereas a weaker recommendation is indicated by “we suggest. Results: Based on the findings from the systematic review, our recommendations were: (1) We suggest rehabilitation be offered to patients with acute spinal cord injury when they are medically stable and can tolerate required rehabilitation intensity (no included studies; expert opinion); (2) We suggest body weight–supported treadmill training as an option for ambulation training in addition to conventional overground walking, dependent on resource availability, context, and local expertise (low evidence); (3) We suggest that individuals with acute and subacute cervical SCI be offered functional electrical stimulation as an option to improve hand and upper extremity function (low evidence); and (4) Based on the absence of any clear benefit, we suggest not offering additional training in unsupported sitting beyond what is currently incorporated in standard rehabilitation (low evidence). Conclusions: These guidelines should be implemented into clinical practice to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in patients with SCI by promoting standardization of care, decreasing the heterogeneity of management strategies and encouraging clinicians to make evidence-informed decisions.
AB - Introduction: The objective of this study is to develop guidelines that outline the appropriate type and timing of rehabilitation in patients with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address key questions related to rehabilitation in patients with acute SCI. A multidisciplinary guideline development group used this information, and their clinical expertise, to develop recommendations for the type and timing of rehabilitation. Based on GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation), a strong recommendation is worded as “we recommend,” whereas a weaker recommendation is indicated by “we suggest. Results: Based on the findings from the systematic review, our recommendations were: (1) We suggest rehabilitation be offered to patients with acute spinal cord injury when they are medically stable and can tolerate required rehabilitation intensity (no included studies; expert opinion); (2) We suggest body weight–supported treadmill training as an option for ambulation training in addition to conventional overground walking, dependent on resource availability, context, and local expertise (low evidence); (3) We suggest that individuals with acute and subacute cervical SCI be offered functional electrical stimulation as an option to improve hand and upper extremity function (low evidence); and (4) Based on the absence of any clear benefit, we suggest not offering additional training in unsupported sitting beyond what is currently incorporated in standard rehabilitation (low evidence). Conclusions: These guidelines should be implemented into clinical practice to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in patients with SCI by promoting standardization of care, decreasing the heterogeneity of management strategies and encouraging clinicians to make evidence-informed decisions.
KW - acute spinal cord injury
KW - clinical guideline
KW - guideline
KW - rehabilitation
KW - spinal cord injury
KW - traumatic spinal cord injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029120901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029120901&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2192568217701910
DO - 10.1177/2192568217701910
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029120901
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 7
SP - 231S-238S
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 3_supplement
ER -