Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A questionnaire survey on radiation protection among 282 medical staff from 26 endoscopy-fluoroscopy departments in Japan

  • Shiro Hayashi
  • , Mamoru Takenaka
  • , Hirofumi Kogure
  • , Takayuki Yakushijin
  • , Hirotsugu Maruyama
  • , Yasuki Hori
  • , Toshiyuki Yoshio
  • , Kenji Ikezawa
  • , Tadayuki Takagi
  • , Satoshi Asai
  • , Kazuhiro Matsunaga
  • , Kengo Matsumoto
  • , Hidetaka Tsumura
  • , Shinjiro Yamaguchi
  • , Tetsuya Sumiyoshi
  • , Koji Nagaike
  • , Yuzuru Tamaru
  • , Kazuo Hara
  • , Toshio Fujisawa
  • , Ichiro Oda
  • Ken Ohnita, Motohiko Kato, Hiroko Nebiki, Tatsuya Mikami, Akihiro Nishihara, Satoshi Egawa, Ryuki Minami, Makoto Hosono, Tsutomu Nishida

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and aims: It is essential for endoscopists, technologists, and nurses to understand radiation protection. However, protective equipment usage is still low, and there is little awareness of radiation protection in practice. Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey on radiation protection from January to February 2020. The participants were medical staff, including medical doctors, nurses, and radiological and endoscopy technician in endoscopy-fluoroscopy departments. The questionnaire included 14 multiple-choice questions divided among three parts: background, equipment, and knowledge. Results: We surveyed a total of 282 subjects from 26 institutions. There were 168 medical doctors (60%), 90 nurses (32%), and 24 technologists (9%). Although almost all staff members (99%) always wore a lead apron, only a few wore a thyroid collar (32%) and lead glasses (21%). The rate of wearing a radiation dosimeter was insufficient (69%), especially among doctors (52%). A few subjects knew the radiation exposure dose of each procedure (15%), and slightly over half had attended lectures on radiation protection (64%) and knew about the three principles of radiation protection (59%). Protection adherence did not differ by years of experience, knowledge of fluoroscopy, awareness of radiation exposure doses, or attendance at basic lectures on radiation protection. However, medical doctors who were aware of the radiation exposure dose of each procedure were significantly more likely to wear dosimeters than those who were not (p = 0.0008). Conclusion: Medical staff in endoscopy departments in Japan do not have enough radiation protection equipment or education.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere5
JournalDEN Open
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Apr

Keywords

  • education
  • endoscopy
  • medical staff
  • questionnaire survey
  • radiation protection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Internal Medicine
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A questionnaire survey on radiation protection among 282 medical staff from 26 endoscopy-fluoroscopy departments in Japan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this