TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized phase II/III trial of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab versus dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab, in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma (JCOG1311)
T2 - Primary analysis
AU - on behalf of Japan Clinical Oncology Group
AU - Ishikawa, Mitsuya
AU - Shibata, Taro
AU - Iwata, Takashi
AU - Nishio, Shin
AU - Takada, Toshio
AU - Suzuki, Shiro
AU - Horie, Koji
AU - Kudaka, Wataru
AU - Kagabu, Masahiro
AU - Tanikawa, Michihiro
AU - Kitagawa, Ryo
AU - Takekuma, Munetaka
AU - Kobayashi, Hiroaki
AU - Yaegashi, Nobuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by AMED under Grant Number JP18ck0106222 and JP20ck0106513 and by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund of Japan ( 23-A-17 , 26-A-4 , 29-A-3 and 2020-J-3 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (ddTC) with or without bevacizumab compared to conventional, tri-weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (cTC) with or without bevacizumab, in metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma not amenable to curative local therapy. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the cTC or ddTC arm. The cTC regimen was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1. The ddTC regimen was paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 and carboplatin at AUC of 5 on day 1. Both cTC and ddTC treatments were repeated every 3 weeks for up to 9 cycles. After bevacizumab was approved in Japan, patients in both arms received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg if not contraindicated. The primary endpoint of phase II part was response rate (RR). If the RR of ddTC+bevacizumab was found to be at least 5% better than to cTC + bevacizumab, the study would proceed to phase III part, which had overall survival as its primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180007. Results: In total, 122 patients were randomly assigned to either the cTC arm (cTC + bevacizumab: 32; cTC:29) or the ddTC arm (ddTC+bevacizumab: 30; ddTC:31). The RR for patients on cTC + bevacizumab was 67.9%, and for patients on ddTC+bevacizumab 60.7%, cTC: 55.2%, and ddTC: 50.0%. Conclusions: The study did not meet the primary endpoint of phase II portion. Dose-dense, weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin is not promising for metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma.
AB - Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of dose-dense weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (ddTC) with or without bevacizumab compared to conventional, tri-weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (cTC) with or without bevacizumab, in metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma not amenable to curative local therapy. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to either the cTC or ddTC arm. The cTC regimen was paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the curve (AUC) of 5 on day 1. The ddTC regimen was paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on day 1, 8, 15 and carboplatin at AUC of 5 on day 1. Both cTC and ddTC treatments were repeated every 3 weeks for up to 9 cycles. After bevacizumab was approved in Japan, patients in both arms received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg if not contraindicated. The primary endpoint of phase II part was response rate (RR). If the RR of ddTC+bevacizumab was found to be at least 5% better than to cTC + bevacizumab, the study would proceed to phase III part, which had overall survival as its primary endpoint. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180007. Results: In total, 122 patients were randomly assigned to either the cTC arm (cTC + bevacizumab: 32; cTC:29) or the ddTC arm (ddTC+bevacizumab: 30; ddTC:31). The RR for patients on cTC + bevacizumab was 67.9%, and for patients on ddTC+bevacizumab 60.7%, cTC: 55.2%, and ddTC: 50.0%. Conclusions: The study did not meet the primary endpoint of phase II portion. Dose-dense, weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin is not promising for metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma.
KW - Chemotherapy
KW - Metastatic or recurrent cervical carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106226394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106226394&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 34016453
AN - SCOPUS:85106226394
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 162
SP - 292
EP - 298
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 2
ER -