Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

AI-based diagnosis of nuclear cataract from slit-lamp videos

  • Eisuke Shimizu
  • , Makoto Tanji
  • , Shintato Nakayama
  • , Toshiki Ishikawa
  • , Naomichi Agata
  • , Ryota Yokoiwa
  • , Hiroki Nishimura
  • , Rohan Jeetendra Khemlani
  • , Shinri Sato
  • , Akiko Hanyuda
  • , Yasunori Sato

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In ophthalmology, the availability of many fundus photographs and optical coherence tomography images has spurred consideration of using artificial intelligence (AI) for diagnosing retinal and optic nerve disorders. However, AI application for diagnosing anterior segment eye conditions remains unfeasible due to limited standardized images and analysis models. We addressed this limitation by augmenting the quantity of standardized optical images using a video-recordable slit-lamp device. We then investigated whether our proposed machine learning (ML) AI algorithm could accurately diagnose cataracts from videos recorded with this device. We collected 206,574 cataract frames from 1812 cataract eye videos. Ophthalmologists graded the nuclear cataracts (NUCs) using the cataract grading scale of the World Health Organization. These gradings were used to train and validate an ML algorithm. A validation dataset was used to compare the NUC diagnosis and grading of AI and ophthalmologists. The results of individual cataract gradings were: NUC 0: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.967; NUC 1: AUC = 0.928; NUC 2: AUC = 0.923; and NUC 3: AUC = 0.949. Our ML-based cataract diagnostic model achieved performance comparable to a conventional device, presenting a promising and accurate auto diagnostic AI tool.

Original languageEnglish
Article number22046
JournalScientific reports
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Dec

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AI-based diagnosis of nuclear cataract from slit-lamp videos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this