TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between the Co-administration of Histamine H2 Receptor Antagonists and the Effectiveness of Capecitabine in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
T2 - Propensity Score Analysis
AU - Yamazaki, Tomoko
AU - Uozumi, Ryuji
AU - Kawazoe, Hitoshi
AU - Kitazume, Yoshiko
AU - Iihara, Hirotoshi
AU - Fujii, Hironori
AU - Takahashi, Masaya
AU - Arai, Takahiro
AU - Murachi, Yasushi
AU - Sato, Yumiko
AU - Mikami, Takahiro
AU - Hashiguchi, Koji
AU - Yoshizawa, Tomoe
AU - Takahashi, Katsuyuki
AU - Fujita, Yukiyoshi
AU - Hosokawa, Yuki
AU - Morozumi, Issei
AU - Tsuchiya, Masami
AU - Yokoyama, Atsushi
AU - Hashimoto, Hironobu
AU - Furukawa, Tetsuya
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Keio Gijuku Fukuzawa Memorial Fund for the Advancement of Education and Research (2021) and the Policy-based Medical Services Foundation (2021) in Japan. The funders had no role in the study’s design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Funding Information:
We are grateful to all the participants and medical staff of the nine participating institutions, including the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tochigi Cancer Center, Gifu University Hospital, Osaka City University Hospital, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Osaka University Hospital, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Miyagi Cancer Center, and Yokohama Minami Kyousai Hospital, who were involved in this study. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing. This work was supported in part by the Keio Gijuku Fukuzawa Memorial Fund for the Advancement of Education and Research (2021) and the Policy-based Medical Services Foundation (2021) in Japan. The funders had no role in the study’s design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© The author(s).
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: The association between the effectiveness of capecitabine and the concomitant administration of gastric acid suppressants remains controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the effectiveness of capecitabine is affected by the co-administration of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using real-world data. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included consecutive patients with stage II–III CRC who received either capecitabine monotherapy or the CapeOX regimen (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) as adjuvant therapy between January 2009 and December 2014 in Japan. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Additionally, multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, propensity score adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were performed. Results: In total, 552 patients were included in this study, of which 30 were co-administered H2RAs. RFS at five years was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.2–88.1%) and 79.8% (95% CI: 76.0–83.0%) in the H2RA and non-H2RA groups, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score-adjusted analyses showed that the co-administration of H2RAs was associated with a poor RFS among those receiving capecitabine monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI: 0.86–4.70 and HR, 1.81; 95% CI: 0.77–4.22), respectively. In contrast, these results were inconsistent with the group receiving the CapeOX regimen. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that the co-administration of H2RAs may not reduce the effectiveness of capecitabine therapy in patients with early-stage CRC. To confirm this relationship, a prospective study with a pharmacokinetic approach is needed.
AB - Background: The association between the effectiveness of capecitabine and the concomitant administration of gastric acid suppressants remains controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the effectiveness of capecitabine is affected by the co-administration of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using real-world data. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included consecutive patients with stage II–III CRC who received either capecitabine monotherapy or the CapeOX regimen (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) as adjuvant therapy between January 2009 and December 2014 in Japan. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Additionally, multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, propensity score adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were performed. Results: In total, 552 patients were included in this study, of which 30 were co-administered H2RAs. RFS at five years was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.2–88.1%) and 79.8% (95% CI: 76.0–83.0%) in the H2RA and non-H2RA groups, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score-adjusted analyses showed that the co-administration of H2RAs was associated with a poor RFS among those receiving capecitabine monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI: 0.86–4.70 and HR, 1.81; 95% CI: 0.77–4.22), respectively. In contrast, these results were inconsistent with the group receiving the CapeOX regimen. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that the co-administration of H2RAs may not reduce the effectiveness of capecitabine therapy in patients with early-stage CRC. To confirm this relationship, a prospective study with a pharmacokinetic approach is needed.
KW - CapeOX
KW - capecitabine
KW - colorectal cancer
KW - drug-drug interaction
KW - histamine H2 receptor antagonist
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136176477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136176477&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7150/jca.73385
DO - 10.7150/jca.73385
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85136176477
SN - 1837-9664
VL - 13
SP - 3073
EP - 3083
JO - Journal of Cancer
JF - Journal of Cancer
IS - 10
ER -