TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated Surgical-Phase Recognition for Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Using Artificial Intelligence
AU - Takeuchi, Masashi
AU - Kawakubo, Hirofumi
AU - Saito, Kosuke
AU - Maeda, Yusuke
AU - Matsuda, Satoru
AU - Fukuda, Kazumasa
AU - Nakamura, Rieko
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
N1 - Funding Information:
Yuko Kitagawa received lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Nippon Covidien, Inc., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K. Yuko Kitagawa was supported by grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Yakult Honsha Co. Ltd., Asahi Kasei Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tsumura & Co., Kyouwa Hakkou Kirin Co., Ltd., Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., EA Pharma Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma, Inc., Toyama Chemical Co., Ltd., Medicon, Inc., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Teijin Pharma Limited, Nihon Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Nippon Covidien, Inc. Yuko Kitagawa held an endowed chair provided by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Society of Surgical Oncology.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Background: Although a number of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) procedures have been performed due to three-dimensional field of view, image stabilization, and flexible joint function, both the surgeons and surgical teams require proficiency. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated surgical-phase recognition system for RAMIE by analyzing robotic surgical videos. Methods: This study enrolled 31 patients who underwent RAMIE. The videos were annotated into the following nine surgical phases: preparation, lower mediastinal dissection, upper mediastinal dissection, azygos vein division, subcarinal lymph node dissection (LND), right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) LND, left RLN LND, esophageal transection, and post-dissection to completion of surgery to train the AI for automated phase recognition. An additional phase (“no step”) was used to indicate video sequences upon removal of the camera from the thoracic cavity. All the patients were divided into two groups, namely, early period (20 patients) and late period (11 patients), after which the relationship between the surgical-phase duration and the surgical periods was assessed. Results: Fourfold cross validation was applied to evaluate the performance of the current model. The AI had an accuracy of 84%. The preparation (p = 0.012), post-dissection to completion of surgery (p = 0.003), and “no step” (p < 0.001) phases predicted by the AI were significantly shorter in the late period than in the early period. Conclusions: A highly accurate automated surgical-phase recognition system for RAMIE was established using deep learning. Specific phase durations were significantly associated with the surgical period at the authors’ institution.
AB - Background: Although a number of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) procedures have been performed due to three-dimensional field of view, image stabilization, and flexible joint function, both the surgeons and surgical teams require proficiency. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated surgical-phase recognition system for RAMIE by analyzing robotic surgical videos. Methods: This study enrolled 31 patients who underwent RAMIE. The videos were annotated into the following nine surgical phases: preparation, lower mediastinal dissection, upper mediastinal dissection, azygos vein division, subcarinal lymph node dissection (LND), right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) LND, left RLN LND, esophageal transection, and post-dissection to completion of surgery to train the AI for automated phase recognition. An additional phase (“no step”) was used to indicate video sequences upon removal of the camera from the thoracic cavity. All the patients were divided into two groups, namely, early period (20 patients) and late period (11 patients), after which the relationship between the surgical-phase duration and the surgical periods was assessed. Results: Fourfold cross validation was applied to evaluate the performance of the current model. The AI had an accuracy of 84%. The preparation (p = 0.012), post-dissection to completion of surgery (p = 0.003), and “no step” (p < 0.001) phases predicted by the AI were significantly shorter in the late period than in the early period. Conclusions: A highly accurate automated surgical-phase recognition system for RAMIE was established using deep learning. Specific phase durations were significantly associated with the surgical period at the authors’ institution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132978226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132978226&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-022-11996-1
DO - 10.1245/s10434-022-11996-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 35763234
AN - SCOPUS:85132978226
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 29
SP - 6847
EP - 6855
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 11
ER -