TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmarking System Monitoring on Quality Improvement in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
T2 - A Nationwide Registry in Japan
AU - J-PCI Registry Investigators
AU - Saito, Yuichi
AU - Inohara, Taku
AU - Kohsaka, Shun
AU - Wada, Hideki
AU - Kumamaru, Hiraku
AU - Yamaji, Kyohei
AU - Ishii, Hideki
AU - Amano, Tetsuya
AU - Miyata, Hiroaki
AU - Kobayashi, Yoshio
AU - Kozuma, Ken
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background: Quality indicators (QIs) have been developed to improve and standardize care quality in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In Japan, consecutive PCI procedures are registered in a nationwide database (the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention registry), which introduces a benchmarking system for comparing individual institutional performance against the national average. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the benchmarking system implementation on QI improvement at the hospital level. Methods: A total of 734,264 PCIs were conducted at 1,194 institutions between January 2019 and December 2021. In January 2018, a web-based benchmarking system encompassing 7 QIs for PCI at the institutional level, including door-to-balloon time and rate of transradial intervention, was introduced. The process by which institutions tracked their QIs was centrally monitored. Results: During the 3-year study period, the benchmarking system was reviewed at least once at 742 institutions (62.1%) (median 4 times; Q1-Q3: 2-7 times). The institutions that reviewed their records had higher PCI volumes. Among these institutions, although door-to-balloon time was not directly associated, the proportion of transradial intervention increased by 2.3% in the system review group during the initial year compared with 0.7% in their counterparts. However, in the subsequent year, the association between system reviews and QI improvement was attenuated. Conclusions: The implementation of a benchmarking system, reviewed by participating institutions in Japan, was partially associated with improved QIs during the first year; however, this improvement was attenuated in the subsequent year, highlighting the need for further efforts to develop effective and sustainable interventions to enhance care quality in PCI.
AB - Background: Quality indicators (QIs) have been developed to improve and standardize care quality in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In Japan, consecutive PCI procedures are registered in a nationwide database (the Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention registry), which introduces a benchmarking system for comparing individual institutional performance against the national average. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the benchmarking system implementation on QI improvement at the hospital level. Methods: A total of 734,264 PCIs were conducted at 1,194 institutions between January 2019 and December 2021. In January 2018, a web-based benchmarking system encompassing 7 QIs for PCI at the institutional level, including door-to-balloon time and rate of transradial intervention, was introduced. The process by which institutions tracked their QIs was centrally monitored. Results: During the 3-year study period, the benchmarking system was reviewed at least once at 742 institutions (62.1%) (median 4 times; Q1-Q3: 2-7 times). The institutions that reviewed their records had higher PCI volumes. Among these institutions, although door-to-balloon time was not directly associated, the proportion of transradial intervention increased by 2.3% in the system review group during the initial year compared with 0.7% in their counterparts. However, in the subsequent year, the association between system reviews and QI improvement was attenuated. Conclusions: The implementation of a benchmarking system, reviewed by participating institutions in Japan, was partially associated with improved QIs during the first year; however, this improvement was attenuated in the subsequent year, highlighting the need for further efforts to develop effective and sustainable interventions to enhance care quality in PCI.
KW - benchmarking
KW - feedback
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - quality indicator
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85187576212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85187576212&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.12.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.12.003
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85187576212
SN - 2772-3747
VL - 4
SP - 323
EP - 331
JO - JACC: Asia
JF - JACC: Asia
IS - 4
ER -