Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Better method for detection of CD30: Immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry?

  • Morihiro Higashi
  • , Jun Kikuchi
  • , Chiaki Murakami
  • , Natsuko Takayanagi
  • , Shuji Momose
  • , Masahiro Kizaki
  • , Jun Ichi Tamaru

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We compared the two methods of assessing CD30 protein expression in DLBCL and TCL specimens routinely employed at our hospital, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and flow cytometry (FCM), using the same clone of the anti-CD30 antibody (Ber-H2) in 123 patients with DLBCL and 28 patients with TCL. FCM was more sensitive than IHC, especially in cases with low expres-sion. In three cases of TCL and two cases of DLBCL, there was discordance between these two methods. Two of these TCL cases were ALCL and one was peripheral T-cell lymphoma, NOS, but ALCL was unable to be excluded. One of two cases of DLBCL was an anaplastic variant of DLBCL. The data suggested that CD30 was undetectable, though rare, by FMC in several cases. Based on this study, a combination of IHC and FCM is recommended for the reliable and quantitative detection of CD30.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-223
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CD30
  • T-cell lymphoma
  • diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
  • flow cytometry
  • immunohistochemistry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Better method for detection of CD30: Immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this