TY - JOUR
T1 - Bleeding risk of apixaban, dabigatran, and low-dose rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation
T2 - a propensity matched analysis of administrative claims data
AU - Kohsaka, Shun
AU - Murata, Tatsunori
AU - Izumi, Naoko
AU - Katada, Jun
AU - Wang, Feng
AU - Terayama, Yasuo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Pfizer Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2017/11/2
Y1 - 2017/11/2
N2 - Objectives: There is scarce evidence comparing novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in real-world settings in Japan. This study compared the risk of bleeding events among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating treatment with NOACs versus warfarin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a de-identified electronic health record based database of health claims and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from 275 consenting hospitals in Japan. NVAF patients newly initiated on oral anticoagulants were eligible. Based on the first prescription, patients were assigned to 5/2.5 mg BID apixaban, 150/110 mg BID dabigatran, 15/10 mg QD rivaroxaban (approved dose lower in Japan compared to Western countries [20/15 mg QD]) or warfarin groups. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient characteristics between warfarin and each NOAC. Patients were followed up to 1 year post-first prescription. Results: Among 38,662 eligible patients, a total of 5977, 5090, and 6726 matched pairs were identified for warfarin versus apixaban, warfarin versus dabigatran, and warfarin versus rivaroxaban, respectively after PSM. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (hazard ratio [HR] 0.586; 95% CI 0.421–0.815), dabigatran (HR 0.617; 0.425–0.895) and rivaroxaban (HR 0.693; 0.514–0.933) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. The risk of any bleeding was significantly lower for apixaban (HR 0.782; 0.682–0.896), but not for dabigatran (HR 0.988; 0.860–1.135) or rivaroxaban (HR 0.938; 0.832–1.057) when comparing to warfarin. Conclusions: Among Japanese patients with NVAF, treatment with apixaban 5/2.5 mg BID was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding and any bleeding when compared to warfarin. Treatment with dabigatran 150/110 mg BID or rivaroxaban 15/10 mg QD was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding, but not any bleeding, than warfarin. The potential benefit of individual NOACs in real-world practice needs to be assessed further.
AB - Objectives: There is scarce evidence comparing novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in real-world settings in Japan. This study compared the risk of bleeding events among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) initiating treatment with NOACs versus warfarin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a de-identified electronic health record based database of health claims and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data from 275 consenting hospitals in Japan. NVAF patients newly initiated on oral anticoagulants were eligible. Based on the first prescription, patients were assigned to 5/2.5 mg BID apixaban, 150/110 mg BID dabigatran, 15/10 mg QD rivaroxaban (approved dose lower in Japan compared to Western countries [20/15 mg QD]) or warfarin groups. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance patient characteristics between warfarin and each NOAC. Patients were followed up to 1 year post-first prescription. Results: Among 38,662 eligible patients, a total of 5977, 5090, and 6726 matched pairs were identified for warfarin versus apixaban, warfarin versus dabigatran, and warfarin versus rivaroxaban, respectively after PSM. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (hazard ratio [HR] 0.586; 95% CI 0.421–0.815), dabigatran (HR 0.617; 0.425–0.895) and rivaroxaban (HR 0.693; 0.514–0.933) were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding. The risk of any bleeding was significantly lower for apixaban (HR 0.782; 0.682–0.896), but not for dabigatran (HR 0.988; 0.860–1.135) or rivaroxaban (HR 0.938; 0.832–1.057) when comparing to warfarin. Conclusions: Among Japanese patients with NVAF, treatment with apixaban 5/2.5 mg BID was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding and any bleeding when compared to warfarin. Treatment with dabigatran 150/110 mg BID or rivaroxaban 15/10 mg QD was associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding, but not any bleeding, than warfarin. The potential benefit of individual NOACs in real-world practice needs to be assessed further.
KW - Bleeding
KW - apixaban
KW - dabigatran
KW - nonvalvular atrial filtration
KW - novel oral anticoagulants
KW - rivaroxaban
KW - warfarin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029405094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029405094&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03007995.2017.1374935
DO - 10.1080/03007995.2017.1374935
M3 - Article
C2 - 28857611
AN - SCOPUS:85029405094
SN - 0300-7995
VL - 33
SP - 1955
EP - 1963
JO - Current Medical Research and Opinion
JF - Current Medical Research and Opinion
IS - 11
ER -