Blocking screw augmentation in intramedullary nailing for displaced surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus

Noboru Matsumura, Ryogo Furuhata, Takumi Nakamura, Hiroo Kimura, Taku Suzuki, Takuji Iwamoto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A displaced surgical neck fracture can be a good indication for antegrade intramedullary nailing. However, nail insertion may result in malreduction and translational displacement of the humeral head fragment because of muscle traction and size discrepancies between the diameters of the medullary canal and the intramedullary nail. We used blocking screw augmentation in 20 fractures with residual medial displacement of the distal fragment after nail insertion to anatomically reduce displacement of the fracture and to maintain the reduced position before bone union. A blocking screw was placed percutaneously at the lateral side of the canal. Next, a straight intramedullary nail was reinserted medial to the blocking screw. Finally, the nail was locked both proximally and distally. All cases showed bone union without fixation failure at the time of the final follow-up. Blocking screw augmentation with intramedullary nailing is feasible for the treatment of humeral surgical neck fractures and is thought to be helpful for fracture reduction during surgery and stable fixation after surgery.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)46-51
Number of pages6
JournalJSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022 Feb

Keywords

  • Blocking screw
  • Intramedullary nail
  • Osteosynthesis
  • Poller screw
  • Proximal humeral fracture
  • Surgical neck fracture
  • Technical Note

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reviews and References, Medical

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blocking screw augmentation in intramedullary nailing for displaced surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this