Correction to: Level-2 Large Deviation Principle for Countable Markov Shifts Without Gibbs States (Journal of Statistical Physics, (2023), 190, 7, (120), 10.1007/s10955-023-03126-2)

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Since the measure μ0 constructed in the proof of [1, Lemma 3.2] depends on n, the statement of [1, Proposition J] is incorrect. The correct statement is as follows. Let ϕ:X→R be acceptable and satisfy P(ϕ)<∞. Let ℓ≥1, φ→∈Cu(X), α→∈R and let C⊂M(X) be a non-empty closed set of the form (Formula presented.) For any ε>0 there exists n0≥1 such that for every n≥n0, there exists μ∈Mϕ(X,σ) such that ∫φ→dμ>α→-ε→ and (Formula presented.) The proof of Proposition J remains intact. At the end of the proof we consider sufficiently large n, without letting n→∞. The phrase ‘By Lemma 3.2’ in the third paragraph of Sect. 3.3 should be replaced by ‘By Proposition J’.

Original languageEnglish
Article number41
JournalJournal of Statistical Physics
Volume191
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Apr

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Mathematical Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Level-2 Large Deviation Principle for Countable Markov Shifts Without Gibbs States (Journal of Statistical Physics, (2023), 190, 7, (120), 10.1007/s10955-023-03126-2)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this