TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-benefits analysis of non-energy benefits (NEB) for each stakeholders and consideration for redistribution of NEB
T2 - Study on low-carbon communities and cities by use of decentralized energy network
AU - Mizuishi, Tadashi
AU - Ikaga, Toshiharu
AU - Murakami, Shuzo
AU - Kuzuki, Ryota
AU - Yamada, Koya
PY - 2013/2
Y1 - 2013/2
N2 - 1. This study has carried out a cost benefits analysis for each stakeholder in an attempt to develop low-carbon communities and cities by implementing regional cogeneration systems and leasing photovoltaic systems to commercial buildings. 2. As a result, the economic benefits for energy service provider acting as an investor have been proved when non-energy benefits (NEBs) are accounted. In addition, numerous benefits to stakeholders other than investor have been proved. Also, subsidies by public sector (National, Local Government) will increase the economic efficiency for energy service provider (investor). 3. Since building owners and building users will gain NEBs such as of increase in real estate value, risk reduction (contribution of business and living continuity plan (BLCP), regulatory compliance etc) and maintenance cost reduction, possibility for redistribution of NEBs to the energy service provider (investor) in the form of service charge (rent, energy expense etc) have also been considered.
AB - 1. This study has carried out a cost benefits analysis for each stakeholder in an attempt to develop low-carbon communities and cities by implementing regional cogeneration systems and leasing photovoltaic systems to commercial buildings. 2. As a result, the economic benefits for energy service provider acting as an investor have been proved when non-energy benefits (NEBs) are accounted. In addition, numerous benefits to stakeholders other than investor have been proved. Also, subsidies by public sector (National, Local Government) will increase the economic efficiency for energy service provider (investor). 3. Since building owners and building users will gain NEBs such as of increase in real estate value, risk reduction (contribution of business and living continuity plan (BLCP), regulatory compliance etc) and maintenance cost reduction, possibility for redistribution of NEBs to the energy service provider (investor) in the form of service charge (rent, energy expense etc) have also been considered.
KW - Cost-benefit analysis
KW - Decentralized energy system
KW - Non-energy benefits
KW - Stakeholders
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878949993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878949993&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3130/aije.78.175
DO - 10.3130/aije.78.175
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84878949993
SN - 1348-0685
VL - 78
SP - 175
EP - 181
JO - Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)
JF - Journal of Environmental Engineering (Japan)
IS - 684
ER -