TY - JOUR
T1 - Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in East Asian patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
T2 - Subgroup analyses of the phase 3 POLLUX study
AU - Suzuki, Kenshi
AU - Dimopoulos, Meletios A.
AU - Takezako, Naoki
AU - Okamoto, Shinichiro
AU - Shinagawa, Atsushi
AU - Matsumoto, Morio
AU - Kosugi, Hiroshi
AU - Yoon, Sung Soo
AU - Huang, Shang Yi
AU - Qin, Xiang
AU - Qi, Ming
AU - Iida, Shinsuke
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Janssen Global Services, LLC. Medical writing support was provided by Kimberly Carmony, Ph.D., of MedErgy, and was funded by Janssen Global Services, LLC.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s).
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - In the phase 3 POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) significantly reduced the risk of progression/death and induced deeper responses vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report a subgroup analysis of East Asian (Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese) patients from POLLUX based on a longer follow-up of 24.7 months. Median progression-free survival was not reached (NR) for DRd vs. 13.8 months for Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.76), and overall response rates were higher for DRd vs. Rd (90.2 vs. 72.1%). DRd extended the median duration of response vs. Rd (NR vs. 20.2 months), and minimal residual disease-negative rates at the 10 -5 sensitivity threshold were 21.2 vs. 9.1% for DRd vs. Rd. No new safety signals were observed. Similar efficacy and safety were observed in the smaller subgroup of Japanese patients treated with DRd vs. Rd. These results demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety of DRd vs. Rd in East Asian patients and also in the Japanese-only patient subgroup that are consistent with findings in the overall patient population of POLLUX.
AB - In the phase 3 POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) significantly reduced the risk of progression/death and induced deeper responses vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report a subgroup analysis of East Asian (Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese) patients from POLLUX based on a longer follow-up of 24.7 months. Median progression-free survival was not reached (NR) for DRd vs. 13.8 months for Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.76), and overall response rates were higher for DRd vs. Rd (90.2 vs. 72.1%). DRd extended the median duration of response vs. Rd (NR vs. 20.2 months), and minimal residual disease-negative rates at the 10 -5 sensitivity threshold were 21.2 vs. 9.1% for DRd vs. Rd. No new safety signals were observed. Similar efficacy and safety were observed in the smaller subgroup of Japanese patients treated with DRd vs. Rd. These results demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety of DRd vs. Rd in East Asian patients and also in the Japanese-only patient subgroup that are consistent with findings in the overall patient population of POLLUX.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046355740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046355740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41408-018-0071-x
DO - 10.1038/s41408-018-0071-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 29712896
AN - SCOPUS:85046355740
SN - 2044-5385
VL - 8
JO - Blood cancer journal
JF - Blood cancer journal
IS - 4
M1 - 41
ER -