TY - JOUR
T1 - Design strategy for blends of biodegradable polyester and thermoplastic starch based on a molecular dynamics study of the phase-separated interface
AU - Yamaguchi, Akihiro
AU - Arai, Satoshi
AU - Arai, Noriyoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/6/1
Y1 - 2024/6/1
N2 - Molecular insight into the phase-separated interface formed when biodegradable polyesters and thermoplastic starch (TPS) are melt-blended is valuable for the design of composites. In this study, eight different interfaces combining four major biodegradable polyesters (PLA, PBS, PHB and PBAT) and two TPSs [unmodified TPS (nTPS) and citrate-modified TPS (cTPS)] were investigated by using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. According to the MD simulation results, PBS, PHB and PBAT diffuse readily into the TPS and form compatible interfaces, whereas PLA is less compatible with the TPS. The results of tensile simulations show that PBS and PBAT adhere well to TPS; in particular, PBS/cTPS and PBAT/cTPS exhibit high interfacial-fracture energy (G). Both PLA and PHB blended with TPS exhibit low G because PLA is less compatible with TPS and PHB and TPS have low electrostatic interaction. The reason for the high G of PBS/cTPS and PBAT/cTPS is thought to be a combination of three factors: (i) formation of a deep compatible interface, (ii) suppression of void growth by electrostatic interactions and (iii) absorption of strain energy by a change in the conformation of the molecular chains. These three interfacial adhesion mechanisms should be considered when designing biodegradable polyester/TPS blends with good mechanical properties.
AB - Molecular insight into the phase-separated interface formed when biodegradable polyesters and thermoplastic starch (TPS) are melt-blended is valuable for the design of composites. In this study, eight different interfaces combining four major biodegradable polyesters (PLA, PBS, PHB and PBAT) and two TPSs [unmodified TPS (nTPS) and citrate-modified TPS (cTPS)] were investigated by using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. According to the MD simulation results, PBS, PHB and PBAT diffuse readily into the TPS and form compatible interfaces, whereas PLA is less compatible with the TPS. The results of tensile simulations show that PBS and PBAT adhere well to TPS; in particular, PBS/cTPS and PBAT/cTPS exhibit high interfacial-fracture energy (G). Both PLA and PHB blended with TPS exhibit low G because PLA is less compatible with TPS and PHB and TPS have low electrostatic interaction. The reason for the high G of PBS/cTPS and PBAT/cTPS is thought to be a combination of three factors: (i) formation of a deep compatible interface, (ii) suppression of void growth by electrostatic interactions and (iii) absorption of strain energy by a change in the conformation of the molecular chains. These three interfacial adhesion mechanisms should be considered when designing biodegradable polyester/TPS blends with good mechanical properties.
KW - Biodegradable polyester
KW - Compatibility
KW - Interfacial adhesion
KW - Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations
KW - Thermoplastic starch (TPS)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186757086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186757086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122005
DO - 10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122005
M3 - Article
C2 - 38494210
AN - SCOPUS:85186757086
SN - 0144-8617
VL - 333
JO - Carbohydrate Polymers
JF - Carbohydrate Polymers
M1 - 122005
ER -