TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of an interprofessional competency framework for collaborative practice in Japan
AU - Haruta, Junji
AU - Yoshida, Kazue
AU - Goto, Michiko
AU - Yoshimoto, Hisashi
AU - Ichikawa, Shuhei
AU - Mori, Youhei
AU - Yoshimi, Kenji
AU - Otsuka, Mariko
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and Doctors for Communities (DOCS) - Fostering Research-Minded General Physicians from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology New Paradigms - Establishing Centers for Fostering Medical Researchers of the Future, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 16K19170.
Funding Information:
Mie University offered their cooperation as part of a larger project funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and joined the present project of JAIPE. To develop a prototype of interprofessional competency domains, we organized project team 1 which consisted of nine JAIPE Committee members and five Mie University faculty members. Five of the nine JAIPE Committee members and three of the five Mie university faculty members met in late 2014 and reviewed the findings from the thematic analysis in Stage 1. Participants discussed the analysis process and extracted themes, and sometimes confirmed the meaning of the interpretation in areas where they disagreed. After discussion of the analysis, they discussed what appropriate domains should be included and how each domain interacted within an interprofessional competency framework. We developed four well-defined key principles which were applied to the framework’s overall structure and the terminology. To avoid any single individual dominating the discussion, the first, second, and third authors each aided in the talks and led and facilitated discussions from a neutral standpoint. After the authors extracted the domains and statements as a prototype based on the proceedings, all participants, including the authors, came to a consensus about the prototype when no further opinions by email were expressed. This product was set as prototype 1.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and Doctors for Communities (DOCS) - Fostering Research-Minded General Physicians from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology New Paradigms - Establishing Centers for Fostering Medical Researchers of the Future, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 16K19170. We sincerely appreciate following contributors. I. Sakai, T. Shimoi, J. Soma, T. Kobayashi, K. Fujibayashi, Y. Kamiyama, M. Kogami jointed this work stage 1-2. I. Sakai, T. Shimoi, J. Soma, T. Kobayashi, K. Fujibayashi, Y. Kamiyama, M. Kogami, T. Matsui, S. Matagi, A. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, D. Jinnai, C. Nakamura, M. Ohara jointed this work stage 3-4. T. Matsui, S. Matagi, S. Ishikawa, A. Nakamura, Y. Yoshimoto, T. Kobayashi, C. Nakamura, M. Ohara, M. Yoshimura, K. Suzuki, T. Makino, N. Yamagishi, Y. Uehara, S. Hatta jointed this work stage 5. We also appreciate following academic/specialist associations. JAIPE joined this work stage 1-4. The Japan Society for Medical Education, Japanese Dental Education Association, Chiba Academy of Nurse Science, The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, Japanese Physical Therapy Association, Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists, Japanese Association of Nutritional Science Education and Japanese Society for the Study of Social Welfare joined this work in Stage 3-4. The Japan Society for Medical Education, Japanese Dental Education Association, The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan, Japan Society for Pharmaceutical Education, Japanese Physical Therapy Association, Japanese Association of Occupational Therapists, Japanese Association of Nutritional Science Education and Japanese Society for the Study of Social Welfare joined this work in Stage 5.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis.
PY - 2018/7/4
Y1 - 2018/7/4
N2 - Rapid aging of the population necessitates improved collaboration among healthcare professionals. Unfortunately, interprofessional collaboration has yet to be implemented effectively in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to develop an interprofessional competency framework for Japanese healthcare professionals. The project was conducted as a four-step process, starting with initial categorization of potential competency domains, followed by guiding principle and prototype development, feedback on the prototype, and final consensus. First, authors (JH and MO) collected opinions about competency in interprofessional collaboration at two academic meetings of the Japan Association for Interprofessional Education (JAIPE) and then analyzed the data thematically. Second, a project team consisting of JAIPE and University representatives extracted the domains and statements as prototype 1. Third, seven representatives from professional organizations joined the project team and developed prototype 2. We then called for feedback on the revised prototype 2 at both an open symposium and via public comments. Following revision of prototype 2, a new project team including 20 university, professional organization and health practitioner representatives finally discussed prototype 3, developed the final draft and reached a consensus. In analysis after collecting the data, we extracted 11 themes. We developed four key principles which applied to six domains as prototype 1–3. Finally, our competency framework included two core domains of “Patient-/client-/family-/community-centered” and “Interprofessional communication”, and four peripheral domains of “Role contribution”, “Facilitation of relationships”, “Reflection” and “Understanding of others”. We developed an interprofessional competency framework in Japan which consists of two core and four peripheral domains. The interprofessional competency framework is likely to affect the understanding of “high-context” and “relationalism” in Japanese healthcare. We hope that our interprofessional competency framework will encourage the systematic implementation of interprofessional education and collaboration in Japan.
AB - Rapid aging of the population necessitates improved collaboration among healthcare professionals. Unfortunately, interprofessional collaboration has yet to be implemented effectively in Japan. Therefore, we aimed to develop an interprofessional competency framework for Japanese healthcare professionals. The project was conducted as a four-step process, starting with initial categorization of potential competency domains, followed by guiding principle and prototype development, feedback on the prototype, and final consensus. First, authors (JH and MO) collected opinions about competency in interprofessional collaboration at two academic meetings of the Japan Association for Interprofessional Education (JAIPE) and then analyzed the data thematically. Second, a project team consisting of JAIPE and University representatives extracted the domains and statements as prototype 1. Third, seven representatives from professional organizations joined the project team and developed prototype 2. We then called for feedback on the revised prototype 2 at both an open symposium and via public comments. Following revision of prototype 2, a new project team including 20 university, professional organization and health practitioner representatives finally discussed prototype 3, developed the final draft and reached a consensus. In analysis after collecting the data, we extracted 11 themes. We developed four key principles which applied to six domains as prototype 1–3. Finally, our competency framework included two core domains of “Patient-/client-/family-/community-centered” and “Interprofessional communication”, and four peripheral domains of “Role contribution”, “Facilitation of relationships”, “Reflection” and “Understanding of others”. We developed an interprofessional competency framework in Japan which consists of two core and four peripheral domains. The interprofessional competency framework is likely to affect the understanding of “high-context” and “relationalism” in Japanese healthcare. We hope that our interprofessional competency framework will encourage the systematic implementation of interprofessional education and collaboration in Japan.
KW - Competency framework
KW - Interprofessional competency
KW - Japan
KW - inductive thematic analysis approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041233074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041233074&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13561820.2018.1426559
DO - 10.1080/13561820.2018.1426559
M3 - Article
C2 - 29381091
AN - SCOPUS:85041233074
SN - 1356-1820
VL - 32
SP - 436
EP - 443
JO - Journal of Interprofessional Care
JF - Journal of Interprofessional Care
IS - 4
ER -