TY - JOUR
T1 - Different indicators for postprocedural mitral stenosis caused by single- or multiple-clip implantation after percutaneous mitral valve repair
AU - Itabashi, Yuji
AU - Utsunomiya, Hiroto
AU - Kubo, Shunsuke
AU - Mizutani, Yukiko
AU - Mihara, Hirotsugu
AU - Murata, Mitsushige
AU - Siegel, Robert J.
AU - Kar, Saibal
AU - Fukuda, Keiichi
AU - Shiota, Takahiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Background: Postprocedural mitral stenosis (MS) is a main limitation for MitraClip™ (Abbot Vascular, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) procedure. The purpose of this study was to detect the preprocedural predictors of high transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) after MitraClip™ implantation, which indicated postprocedural mitral stenosis (MS). Methods: We studied 79 patients who were implanted with MitraClip™ in our institute. Before the procedure, mitral valve orifice area (MVOA), and anterior–posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annular diameters were measured at diastole using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data set. After the procedure, the mean TMPG was assessed using continuous-wave (CW) Doppler by periprocedural TEE. Results: Preprocedural MVOA, and AP and ML diameter of left ventricular (LV) inflow orifices were larger in patients with mean TMPG ≤4 mmHg than in patients with TMPG >4 mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation. The large MVOA and ML diameter of LV inflow orifice strongly correlated with the low TMPG after 1- and 2-clip implantation. As a result of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the preprocedural MVOA predicted the low postprocedural TMPG more accurately than the ML diameter of LV inflow orifice after 1-clip implantation either in the degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (MR) patients. After 2-clip implantation, however, the preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice predicted it more accurately than the MVOA in the degenerative and functional MR patients. Conclusions: 3D TEE derived MVOA predicts the postprocedural MS after 1-clip implantation, however, preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice is more useful to predict after 2-clip implantation.
AB - Background: Postprocedural mitral stenosis (MS) is a main limitation for MitraClip™ (Abbot Vascular, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) procedure. The purpose of this study was to detect the preprocedural predictors of high transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) after MitraClip™ implantation, which indicated postprocedural mitral stenosis (MS). Methods: We studied 79 patients who were implanted with MitraClip™ in our institute. Before the procedure, mitral valve orifice area (MVOA), and anterior–posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annular diameters were measured at diastole using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) data set. After the procedure, the mean TMPG was assessed using continuous-wave (CW) Doppler by periprocedural TEE. Results: Preprocedural MVOA, and AP and ML diameter of left ventricular (LV) inflow orifices were larger in patients with mean TMPG ≤4 mmHg than in patients with TMPG >4 mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation. The large MVOA and ML diameter of LV inflow orifice strongly correlated with the low TMPG after 1- and 2-clip implantation. As a result of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the preprocedural MVOA predicted the low postprocedural TMPG more accurately than the ML diameter of LV inflow orifice after 1-clip implantation either in the degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation (MR) patients. After 2-clip implantation, however, the preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice predicted it more accurately than the MVOA in the degenerative and functional MR patients. Conclusions: 3D TEE derived MVOA predicts the postprocedural MS after 1-clip implantation, however, preprocedural ML diameter of LV inflow orifice is more useful to predict after 2-clip implantation.
KW - MitraClip
KW - Mitral valve stenosis
KW - Percutaneous mitral valve repair
KW - Transesophageal echocardiography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036522230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036522230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.023
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.10.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 29208340
AN - SCOPUS:85036522230
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 71
SP - 336
EP - 345
JO - Journal of Cardiology
JF - Journal of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -