TY - JOUR
T1 - Distribution analysis of hydrogel spacer and evaluation of rectal dose reduction in Japanese prostate cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy
AU - Kobayashi, Hiroaki
AU - Eriguchi, Takahisa
AU - Tanaka, Tomoki
AU - Ogata, Takeru
AU - Ishida, Masaru
AU - Nakajima, Yosuke
AU - Kumabe, Atsuhiro
AU - Kosugi, Michio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Background: To report on our primary experience with the placement of a hydrogel spacer following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients and assess its impact on dosimetry as well as acute toxicity. Methods: A total of 70 patients treated with SBRT (total dose of 36.25 Gy) in 5 fractions were included. Hydrogel spacers were inserted in 53 patients along with gold fiducial markers. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum on the sagittal image of magnetic resonance imaging and defined it as the upper rectum (UR), middle rectum (MR), and lower rectum (LR). We compared the dose to each part of the rectum with and without hydrogel spacer using dose volume histograms. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity assessments were conducted until 6 months of follow-up visits. Results: The median volume of the hydrogel spacer was 12.3 mL. Overall, the hydrogel spacer could significantly reduce the rectal dose in the middle-to-high-dose region (V20–V35). The rectum doses at the UR and MR were significantly lower in the spacer group in the middle to high dose region (V20–V35); the dose at the LR was significantly lower in the spacer group in the high-dose region (V30–V35). There was no grade ≥ 3 toxicity observed, but grade 2 toxicity of GU and GI occurred in 17.1% and 1.4% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Hydrogel spacers could contribute to rectal dose reduction, especially in high dose regions, by creating a prostate–rectum distance.
AB - Background: To report on our primary experience with the placement of a hydrogel spacer following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients and assess its impact on dosimetry as well as acute toxicity. Methods: A total of 70 patients treated with SBRT (total dose of 36.25 Gy) in 5 fractions were included. Hydrogel spacers were inserted in 53 patients along with gold fiducial markers. For dosimetry, we trisected the rectum on the sagittal image of magnetic resonance imaging and defined it as the upper rectum (UR), middle rectum (MR), and lower rectum (LR). We compared the dose to each part of the rectum with and without hydrogel spacer using dose volume histograms. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity assessments were conducted until 6 months of follow-up visits. Results: The median volume of the hydrogel spacer was 12.3 mL. Overall, the hydrogel spacer could significantly reduce the rectal dose in the middle-to-high-dose region (V20–V35). The rectum doses at the UR and MR were significantly lower in the spacer group in the middle to high dose region (V20–V35); the dose at the LR was significantly lower in the spacer group in the high-dose region (V30–V35). There was no grade ≥ 3 toxicity observed, but grade 2 toxicity of GU and GI occurred in 17.1% and 1.4% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Hydrogel spacers could contribute to rectal dose reduction, especially in high dose regions, by creating a prostate–rectum distance.
KW - Genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities
KW - Hydrogel spacer
KW - Rectal dose reduction
KW - Stereotactic body radiation therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098882958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098882958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10147-020-01855-y
DO - 10.1007/s10147-020-01855-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 33415570
AN - SCOPUS:85098882958
SN - 1341-9625
VL - 26
SP - 736
EP - 743
JO - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - International Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -