Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology

  • Tomoya Maeda
  • , Yuho Najima
  • , Yutaro Kamiyama
  • , Shinji Nakao
  • , Yukinori Ozaki
  • , Hiroshi Nishio
  • , Kenji Tsuchihashi
  • , Eiki Ichihara
  • , Yuji Miumra
  • , Makoto Endo
  • , Dai Maruyama
  • , Tatsuhiro Yoshinami
  • , Nobuyuki Susumu
  • , Munetaka Takekuma
  • , Takashi Motohashi
  • , Mamoru Ito
  • , Eishi Baba
  • , Nobuaki Ochi
  • , Toshio Kubo
  • , Keita Uchino
  • Takahiro Kimura, Shinobu Tamura, Hitomi Nishimoto, Yasuhisa Kato, Atsushi Sato, Toshimi Takano, Shingo Yano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) reduces the incidence, duration, and severity of neutropenia, its prophylactic use for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial due to a theoretically increased risk of relapse. The present study investigated the effects of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for AML with remission induction therapy. A detailed literature search for related studies was performed using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted and assessed by two reviewers. A qualitative analysis of pooled data was conducted, and the risk ratio with corresponding confidence intervals was calculated in the meta-analysis and summarized. Sixteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis, nine of which were examined in the meta-analysis. Although G-CSF significantly shortened the duration of neutropenia, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not correlate with infection-related mortality. Moreover, primary prophylaxis with G-CSF did not affect disease progression/recurrence, overall survival, or adverse events, such as musculoskeletal pain. However, evidence to support or discourage the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis for adult AML patients with induction therapy remains limited. Therefore, the use of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis can be considered for adult AML patients with remission induction therapy who are at a high risk of infectious complications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)535-544
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 May

Keywords

  • AML
  • Adults
  • G-CSF
  • Induction therapy
  • Meta-analysis
  • Neutropenia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this