TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Pterygopalatine Fossa Tumors
AU - Ozawa, Hiroyuki
AU - Sekimizu, Mariko
AU - Saito, Shin
AU - Nakamura, Shintaro
AU - Mikoshiba, Takuya
AU - Toda, Masahiro
AU - Ogawa, Kaoru
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Surgical removal of pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) tumors with endoscopic endonasal approach is still challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate our endoscopic endonasal management of PPF tumors based on the tumor pathology and purpose of the surgery. This comprised both a single nostril approach for biopsy and a binostril approach for complete resection of benign and noninfiltrating tumors. Based on this strategy, 12 patients underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for PPF tumors between 2013 and 2018. The patients' data were analyzed retrospectively to demonstrate the significance of our treatment scheme. The surgery was terminated only after taking a biopsy specimen in 6 patients. Other 6 patients underwent gross total resection or bulk tumor reduction. Final pathological diagnosis was malignant in 6 cases and benign in the remaining 6. Post-operative treatment was needed in 7 patients. Four operations for the 6 patients who underwent either debulking or radical surgery were performed by the binostril approach; while 5 surgeries for the 6 biopsy patients were performed by the single nostril approach. Postoperative complications were tolerable. Endoscopic resection should be adopted preferentially for benign tumors that can be removed in a piecemeal fashion. However, as most malignant tumors were impossible to resect with a negative margin, priority should be given to tumor biopsy using an endoscopic approach, which is less invasive than an open approach, and an appropriate treatment customized to the pathological diagnosis should be administered.
AB - Surgical removal of pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) tumors with endoscopic endonasal approach is still challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate our endoscopic endonasal management of PPF tumors based on the tumor pathology and purpose of the surgery. This comprised both a single nostril approach for biopsy and a binostril approach for complete resection of benign and noninfiltrating tumors. Based on this strategy, 12 patients underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for PPF tumors between 2013 and 2018. The patients' data were analyzed retrospectively to demonstrate the significance of our treatment scheme. The surgery was terminated only after taking a biopsy specimen in 6 patients. Other 6 patients underwent gross total resection or bulk tumor reduction. Final pathological diagnosis was malignant in 6 cases and benign in the remaining 6. Post-operative treatment was needed in 7 patients. Four operations for the 6 patients who underwent either debulking or radical surgery were performed by the binostril approach; while 5 surgeries for the 6 biopsy patients were performed by the single nostril approach. Postoperative complications were tolerable. Endoscopic resection should be adopted preferentially for benign tumors that can be removed in a piecemeal fashion. However, as most malignant tumors were impossible to resect with a negative margin, priority should be given to tumor biopsy using an endoscopic approach, which is less invasive than an open approach, and an appropriate treatment customized to the pathological diagnosis should be administered.
KW - Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery
KW - pterygopalatine fossa tumors
KW - surgical approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112863222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85112863222&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007292
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007292
M3 - Article
C2 - 33252536
AN - SCOPUS:85112863222
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 32
SP - E454-E457
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 5
ER -