TY - JOUR
T1 - Expansion of the Concept of Micropapillary Adenocarcinoma to Include a Newly Recognized Filigree Pattern as Well as the Classical Pattern Based on 1468 Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas
AU - Emoto, Katsura
AU - Eguchi, Takashi
AU - Tan, Kay See
AU - Takahashi, Yusuke
AU - Aly, Rania G.
AU - Rekhtman, Natasha
AU - Travis, William D.
AU - Adusumilli, Prasad S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Adusumilli's laboratory work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 CA217169 and P30 CA008748), the U.S. Department of Defense (grant LC160212), the Joanne and John DallePezze Foundation, the Derfner Foundation, the Mr. William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin, the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research, and the Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We thank Joe Dycoco of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Thoracic Surgery Service for his help with the Thoracic Service lung cancer database. Dr. Emoto, Dr. Eguchi, Dr. Aly, and Dr. Travis collected and analyzed data and designed the figures. Dr. Tan analyzed and generated the figures. Dr. Travis and Dr. Adusumilli designed the study and the figures and collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. Dr. Emoto, Dr. Travis, and Dr. Adusumilli developed the first draft of the article. All authors contributed to drafting the article and provided final approval to submit it for publication. Dr. Travis and Dr. Adusumilli had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the article for publication.
Funding Information:
Dr. Adusumilli’s laboratory work is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (grants R01 CA217169 and P30 CA008748 ), the U.S. Department of Defense (grant LC160212 ), the Joanne and John DallePezze Foundation, the Derfner Foundation, the Mr. William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin, the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research, and the Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We thank Joe Dycoco of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Thoracic Surgery Service for his help with the Thoracic Service lung cancer database. Dr. Emoto, Dr. Eguchi, Dr. Aly, and Dr. Travis collected and analyzed data and designed the figures. Dr. Tan analyzed and generated the figures. Dr. Travis and Dr. Adusumilli designed the study and the figures and collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. Dr. Emoto, Dr. Travis, and Dr. Adusumilli developed the first draft of the article. All authors contributed to drafting the article and provided final approval to submit it for publication. Dr. Travis and Dr. Adusumilli had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the article for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Introduction: The classical micropapillary (MIP) pattern is defined in the 2015 WHO classification as tumor cells growing in papillary tufts forming florets that lack fibrovascular cores, and it is associated with poor prognosis. We observed a novel pattern that we termed a filigree MIP pattern and investigated its relationship with the classical MIP pattern. Methods: Filigree pattern was defined as tumor cells growing in delicate, lace-like, narrow stacks of cells without fibrovascular cores. We required at least three piled-up nuclei from the alveolar wall basal layer, with a breadth of up to three cells across. To assess the relationship of the filigree pattern with the classical MIP pattern, we documented their frequencies in the context of the clinical and pathologic characteristics of 1468 stage I invasive adenocarcinomas, including survival analysis using cumulative incidence of recurrence by competing risks. Results: We observed the filigree MIP pattern in 35% of cases. By including the filigree pattern as an MIP pattern, we identified 57 more MIP predominant cases in addition to the previously diagnosed 87 MIP predominant adenocarcinomas. These 57 cases were reclassified from papillary (n = 37), acinar (n = 16), and solid (n = 4) predominant adenocarcinoma, respectively. Of the 144 MIP predominant adenocarcinomas, the filigree predominant MIP pattern (n = 78) showed a poor prognosis like the classical predominant MIP pattern (n = 66) (p = 0.464). In addition, like the classical MIP pattern (p = 0.010), even a small amount (≥5%) of filigree MIP pattern was significantly associated with worse cumulative incidence of recurrence (p = 0.001) in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: The frequent association with the classical MIP pattern and the similar poor prognosis supports inclusion of the filigree pattern in the MIP pattern subtype.
AB - Introduction: The classical micropapillary (MIP) pattern is defined in the 2015 WHO classification as tumor cells growing in papillary tufts forming florets that lack fibrovascular cores, and it is associated with poor prognosis. We observed a novel pattern that we termed a filigree MIP pattern and investigated its relationship with the classical MIP pattern. Methods: Filigree pattern was defined as tumor cells growing in delicate, lace-like, narrow stacks of cells without fibrovascular cores. We required at least three piled-up nuclei from the alveolar wall basal layer, with a breadth of up to three cells across. To assess the relationship of the filigree pattern with the classical MIP pattern, we documented their frequencies in the context of the clinical and pathologic characteristics of 1468 stage I invasive adenocarcinomas, including survival analysis using cumulative incidence of recurrence by competing risks. Results: We observed the filigree MIP pattern in 35% of cases. By including the filigree pattern as an MIP pattern, we identified 57 more MIP predominant cases in addition to the previously diagnosed 87 MIP predominant adenocarcinomas. These 57 cases were reclassified from papillary (n = 37), acinar (n = 16), and solid (n = 4) predominant adenocarcinoma, respectively. Of the 144 MIP predominant adenocarcinomas, the filigree predominant MIP pattern (n = 78) showed a poor prognosis like the classical predominant MIP pattern (n = 66) (p = 0.464). In addition, like the classical MIP pattern (p = 0.010), even a small amount (≥5%) of filigree MIP pattern was significantly associated with worse cumulative incidence of recurrence (p = 0.001) in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: The frequent association with the classical MIP pattern and the similar poor prognosis supports inclusion of the filigree pattern in the MIP pattern subtype.
KW - Adenocarcinoma
KW - Filigree
KW - Lung
KW - Micropapillary
KW - Prognosis
KW - Recurrence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071402469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071402469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.07.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.07.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 31352072
AN - SCOPUS:85071402469
SN - 1556-0864
VL - 14
SP - 1948
EP - 1961
JO - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
JF - Journal of Thoracic Oncology
IS - 11
ER -