TY - JOUR
T1 - Fertility decision-making under certainty and uncertainty in cancer patients
AU - Komatsu, Hiroko
AU - Yagasaki, Kaori
AU - Yamauchi, Hideko
N1 - Funding Information:
This study supported by the research grant from Keio SFC Academic Society .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Objective The objective of this study was to understand how reproductive-age women with breast cancer make fertility-related decisions. Methods Using grounded theory methodology, we collected data from 11 reproductive-age women with breast cancer between March and August 2016. Verbatim transcriptions were analyzed using constant comparative analysis and open, axial, and selective coding. Results “Fertility Decision-Making under Certainty and Uncertainty” emerged as a core category. Fertility decision-making started with the participants’ “values and preferences” about having a child. In making a decision, there were certainty (“Information” and “Emotional support”) and uncertainty (“Time constraints,” “Recurrent risk,” “Labeling,” and “Unmet needs”) factors. Participants had more uncertainty factors than certainty factors, and healthcare professionals’ services accounted for one of the uncertainty factors. Conclusions After fertility preservation counseling, women with cancer made difficult decisions in stressful situations without sufficient healthcare information and support. Tailored information should be provided to individual women in collaboration between oncology and reproductive health professionals.
AB - Objective The objective of this study was to understand how reproductive-age women with breast cancer make fertility-related decisions. Methods Using grounded theory methodology, we collected data from 11 reproductive-age women with breast cancer between March and August 2016. Verbatim transcriptions were analyzed using constant comparative analysis and open, axial, and selective coding. Results “Fertility Decision-Making under Certainty and Uncertainty” emerged as a core category. Fertility decision-making started with the participants’ “values and preferences” about having a child. In making a decision, there were certainty (“Information” and “Emotional support”) and uncertainty (“Time constraints,” “Recurrent risk,” “Labeling,” and “Unmet needs”) factors. Participants had more uncertainty factors than certainty factors, and healthcare professionals’ services accounted for one of the uncertainty factors. Conclusions After fertility preservation counseling, women with cancer made difficult decisions in stressful situations without sufficient healthcare information and support. Tailored information should be provided to individual women in collaboration between oncology and reproductive health professionals.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Decision-making
KW - Fertility
KW - Qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037622771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037622771&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.002
DO - 10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 29389500
AN - SCOPUS:85037622771
SN - 1877-5756
VL - 15
SP - 40
EP - 45
JO - Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare
JF - Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare
ER -