Abstract
Contrary to the objective of a major corporate pension reform in Japan to enhance retirement income security, and despite the increased relative tax benefits of externally-funded plans, the number of firms that do not sponsor externally-funded defined benefit plans or defined contribution plans has been increasing steadily. We study the common characteristics of firms sponsoring only traditional internally-funded lump sum plans that provide only weak protection of the employees' retirement benefits. We find that smaller firms with higher growth prospects (price-to-book ratios) and a younger workforce are less likely to adopt externally-funded plans and more likely to terminate them when they have one. Firms sponsoring only internally-funded plans tend to exhibit lower profitability than their peers with otherwise similar characteristics. These results suggest that smaller firms with higher growth prospects and a younger workforce tend to have stronger incentives to ensure financial flexibility by providing only weak protection of their employees' retirement benefits.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 753-776 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 Oct |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Japanese firms
- corporate pension plans
- financial flexibility
- internally-funded lump sum plans
- retirement benefits
- tax incentives
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Accounting
- Business, Management and Accounting(all)
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics