Four cases of corneal perforation in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease

Emi Inagaki, Yoko Ogawa, Yukihiro Matsumoto, Tetsuya Kawakita, Shigeto Shimmura, Kazuo Tsubota

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose: To report the clinical features and investigate the underlying pathological processes of spontaneous corneal perforation in patients with ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Methods: A full ophthalmological evaluation of corneal perforation in four patients with cGVHD was performed. Three of them underwent deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty and samples from two of three patients were used for histopathological analyses. Results: Three patients were successfully treated by corneal transplantation. One patient was treated with a therapeutic soft contact lens, and the wound healed within 2 days. The common clinical features of these patients were (1) the presence of definite dry eye related to cGVHD in 3 of 4 patients and probable dry eye in one patient, (2) a central or paracentral site of corneal ulceration and perforation, with no sign of infection, and (3) prior use of a topical or systemic corticosteroid, and/or topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Immunohistochemical findings revealed an increased number of cluster of differentiation 68+ (CD68+) macrophages and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) expression in the tissue surrounding the perforation. Conclusions: Our report extends current information on the clinical features and pathological processes of corneal perforation in cGVHD by showing increased MMP-9 expression and the accumulation of CD68+ positive macrophages in the affected areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)598-606
Number of pages9
JournalMolecular vision
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology


Dive into the research topics of 'Four cases of corneal perforation in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this