TY - JOUR
T1 - How Can Dupilumab Cause Eosinophilic Pneumonia?
AU - Kurihara, Momoko
AU - Masaki, Katsunori
AU - Matsuyama, Emiko
AU - Fujioka, Masato
AU - Hayashi, Reina
AU - Tomiyasu, Saki
AU - Sasahara, Kotaro
AU - Sunata, Keeya
AU - Asaoka, Masato
AU - Akiyama, Yuto
AU - Nishie, Miyuki
AU - Irie, Misato
AU - Tanosaki, Takae
AU - Kabata, Hiroki
AU - Fukunaga, Koichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Reports of eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) as a side effect of dupilumab administration are limited in previous studies. Herein, we report two cases in which EP developed subsequent to the administration of dupilumab for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS). Case 1: A 55-year-old woman presented with ECRS, eosinophilic otitis media, and bronchial asthma, and was treated with dupilumab for ECRS. Five weeks later, fever and dyspnea developed, and infiltration shadows were observed in her lungs. The peripheral blood eosinophil count (PBEC) was 3848/μL (26%), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed eosinophilic infiltration, and EP was subsequently diagnosed. Her condition improved following prednisolone treatment. Case 2: A 59-year-old man presented with fatigue and dyspnea after receiving dupilumab for ECRS. He had infiltrative shadows throughout his left lung field, and his PBEC was 4850/μL (26.5%). Prednisolone was initiated, and his condition improved. EP developed in both patients during the period of elevated PBEC after dupilumab administration, and dupilumab was suspected to be the causative agent in their EP. Hence, EP should be considered as a differential diagnosis when fever and dyspnea appear following dupilumab administration.
AB - Reports of eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) as a side effect of dupilumab administration are limited in previous studies. Herein, we report two cases in which EP developed subsequent to the administration of dupilumab for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS). Case 1: A 55-year-old woman presented with ECRS, eosinophilic otitis media, and bronchial asthma, and was treated with dupilumab for ECRS. Five weeks later, fever and dyspnea developed, and infiltration shadows were observed in her lungs. The peripheral blood eosinophil count (PBEC) was 3848/μL (26%), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid showed eosinophilic infiltration, and EP was subsequently diagnosed. Her condition improved following prednisolone treatment. Case 2: A 59-year-old man presented with fatigue and dyspnea after receiving dupilumab for ECRS. He had infiltrative shadows throughout his left lung field, and his PBEC was 4850/μL (26.5%). Prednisolone was initiated, and his condition improved. EP developed in both patients during the period of elevated PBEC after dupilumab administration, and dupilumab was suspected to be the causative agent in their EP. Hence, EP should be considered as a differential diagnosis when fever and dyspnea appear following dupilumab administration.
KW - IL-4/13
KW - dupilumab
KW - eosinophilic pneumonia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144480052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144480052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/biom12121743
DO - 10.3390/biom12121743
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 36551171
AN - SCOPUS:85144480052
SN - 2218-273X
VL - 12
JO - Biomolecules
JF - Biomolecules
IS - 12
M1 - 1743
ER -