TY - JOUR
T1 - In-hospital mortality associated with the misdiagnosis or unidentified site of infection at admission
AU - Abe, Toshikazu
AU - Tokuda, Yasuharu
AU - Shiraishi, Atsushi
AU - Fujishima, Seitaro
AU - Mayumi, Toshihiko
AU - Sugiyama, Takehiro
AU - Deshpande, Gautam A.
AU - Shiino, Yasukazu
AU - Hifumi, Toru
AU - Otomo, Yasuhiro
AU - Okamoto, Kohji
AU - Kotani, Joji
AU - Sakamoto, Yuichiro
AU - Sasaki, Junichi
AU - Shiraishi, Shin Ichiro
AU - Takuma, Kiyotsugu
AU - Hagiwara, Akiyoshi
AU - Yamakawa, Kazuma
AU - Takeyama, Naoshi
AU - Gando, Satoshi
AU - Muroya, Takashi
AU - Koike, Kaoru
AU - Anan, Hideaki
AU - Sugita, Manabu
AU - Miki, Yasuo
AU - Yamashita, Hisashi
AU - Kittaka, Hirotada
AU - Maehara, Junichi
AU - Nachi, Sho
AU - Morino, Kazuma
AU - Hoshino, Atsumi
AU - Yamaguchi, Hiroyuki
AU - Harada, Masahiro
AU - Ishikura, Hiroyasu
AU - Kawakami, Masato
AU - Deguchi, Yoshizumi
AU - Yoshihara, Hideaki
AU - Hanaki, Yoshihiro
AU - Okada, Kunihiko
AU - Kaneko, Tadashi
AU - Kiyota, Kazuya
AU - Shimizu, Yoshihiro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/6/6
Y1 - 2019/6/6
N2 - Background: Rapid detection, early resuscitation, and appropriate antibiotic use are crucial for sepsis care. Accurate identification of the site of infection may facilitate a timely provision of appropriate care. We aimed to investigate the relationship between misdiagnosis of the site of infection at initial examination and in-hospital mortality. Methods: This was a secondary-multicenter prospective cohort study involving 37 emergency departments. Consecutive adult patients with infection from December 2017 to February 2018 were included. Misdiagnosis of the site of infection was defined as a discrepancy between the suspected site of infection at initial examination and that at final diagnosis, including those infections remaining unidentified during hospital admission, whereas correct diagnosis was defined as site concordance. In-hospital mortality was compared between those misdiagnosed and those correctly diagnosed. Results: Of 974 patients included in the analysis, 11.6% were misdiagnosed. Patients diagnosed with lung, intra-abdominal, urinary, soft tissue, and CNS infection at the initial examination, 4.2%, 3.8%, 13.6%, 10.9%, and 58.3% respectively, turned out to have an infection at a different site. In-hospital mortality occurred in 15%. In both generalized estimating equation (GEE) and propensity score-matched models, misdiagnosed patients exhibited higher mortality despite adjustment for patient background, site infection, and severity. The adjusted odds ratios (misdiagnosis vs. correct diagnosis) for in-hospital mortality were 2.66 (95% CI, 1.45-4.89) in the GEE model and 3.03 (95% CI, 1.24-7.38) in the propensity score-matched model. The difference in the absolute risk in the GEE model was 0.11 (0.04-0.18). Conclusions: Among patients with infection, misdiagnosed site of infection is associated with a > 10% increase in in-hospital mortality.
AB - Background: Rapid detection, early resuscitation, and appropriate antibiotic use are crucial for sepsis care. Accurate identification of the site of infection may facilitate a timely provision of appropriate care. We aimed to investigate the relationship between misdiagnosis of the site of infection at initial examination and in-hospital mortality. Methods: This was a secondary-multicenter prospective cohort study involving 37 emergency departments. Consecutive adult patients with infection from December 2017 to February 2018 were included. Misdiagnosis of the site of infection was defined as a discrepancy between the suspected site of infection at initial examination and that at final diagnosis, including those infections remaining unidentified during hospital admission, whereas correct diagnosis was defined as site concordance. In-hospital mortality was compared between those misdiagnosed and those correctly diagnosed. Results: Of 974 patients included in the analysis, 11.6% were misdiagnosed. Patients diagnosed with lung, intra-abdominal, urinary, soft tissue, and CNS infection at the initial examination, 4.2%, 3.8%, 13.6%, 10.9%, and 58.3% respectively, turned out to have an infection at a different site. In-hospital mortality occurred in 15%. In both generalized estimating equation (GEE) and propensity score-matched models, misdiagnosed patients exhibited higher mortality despite adjustment for patient background, site infection, and severity. The adjusted odds ratios (misdiagnosis vs. correct diagnosis) for in-hospital mortality were 2.66 (95% CI, 1.45-4.89) in the GEE model and 3.03 (95% CI, 1.24-7.38) in the propensity score-matched model. The difference in the absolute risk in the GEE model was 0.11 (0.04-0.18). Conclusions: Among patients with infection, misdiagnosed site of infection is associated with a > 10% increase in in-hospital mortality.
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Infection
KW - Sepsis
KW - Source
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85066826093
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85066826093#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1186/s13054-019-2475-9
DO - 10.1186/s13054-019-2475-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 31171006
AN - SCOPUS:85066826093
SN - 1364-8535
VL - 23
JO - Critical Care
JF - Critical Care
IS - 1
M1 - 202
ER -