TY - JOUR
T1 - Increasing versus maintaining the dose of olanzapine or risperidone in schizophrenia patients who did not respond to a modest dosage
T2 - A double-blind randomized controlled trial
AU - Sakurai, Hitoshi
AU - Suzuki, Takefumi
AU - Bies, Robert R.
AU - Pollock, Bruce G.
AU - Mimura, Masaru
AU - Kapur, Shitij
AU - Uchida, Hiroyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2016 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - Objective: While doctors often increase the dose of an antipsychotic when there is insufficient response, there is limited evidence that this intervention is any better than waiting longer on the lower dose. We put the proposition to test. Method: In this 4-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in psychiatric care from September 2012 to March 2015, 103 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10) who did not respond to olanzapine 10 mg/d or risperidone 3 mg/d were randomly allocated to a dose-increment or -continuation group. In the increment group, antipsychotic doses were doubled for 4 weeks, whereas in the continuation group, doses were not changed. Completion rate (primary outcome measure); changes in psychopathology, function, and extrapyramidal symptoms; and response rate were compared between the groups. The relationship between baseline plasma antipsychotic concentrations and changes in psychopathology was examined. Results: The completion rate was significantly lower in the increment group than in the continuation group (69.2% [36/52] vs 86.3% [44/51], P = .038). No significant superiority was observed in any of the outcome measures in the increment group compared to the continuation group, except the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive subscale score change in intentionto- treat analysis. Those with lower plasma concentrations of olanzapine on their initial treatment showed a greater improvement on the PANSS positive subscale when their dose was increased (P = .042). Conclusions: As a general strategy, patients with schizophrenia failing to respond to moderate antipsychotic doses may not benefit from an increase in dose. The possibility of benefit in those whose plasma antipsychotic concentrations at baseline are still low cannot be ruled out. Trial Registration: UMIN.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm identifier: UMIN000008667.
AB - Objective: While doctors often increase the dose of an antipsychotic when there is insufficient response, there is limited evidence that this intervention is any better than waiting longer on the lower dose. We put the proposition to test. Method: In this 4-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in psychiatric care from September 2012 to March 2015, 103 patients with schizophrenia (ICD-10) who did not respond to olanzapine 10 mg/d or risperidone 3 mg/d were randomly allocated to a dose-increment or -continuation group. In the increment group, antipsychotic doses were doubled for 4 weeks, whereas in the continuation group, doses were not changed. Completion rate (primary outcome measure); changes in psychopathology, function, and extrapyramidal symptoms; and response rate were compared between the groups. The relationship between baseline plasma antipsychotic concentrations and changes in psychopathology was examined. Results: The completion rate was significantly lower in the increment group than in the continuation group (69.2% [36/52] vs 86.3% [44/51], P = .038). No significant superiority was observed in any of the outcome measures in the increment group compared to the continuation group, except the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive subscale score change in intentionto- treat analysis. Those with lower plasma concentrations of olanzapine on their initial treatment showed a greater improvement on the PANSS positive subscale when their dose was increased (P = .042). Conclusions: As a general strategy, patients with schizophrenia failing to respond to moderate antipsychotic doses may not benefit from an increase in dose. The possibility of benefit in those whose plasma antipsychotic concentrations at baseline are still low cannot be ruled out. Trial Registration: UMIN.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm identifier: UMIN000008667.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992731172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992731172&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.15m10490
DO - 10.4088/JCP.15m10490
M3 - Article
C2 - 27788310
AN - SCOPUS:84992731172
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 77
SP - 1381
EP - 1390
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - 10
ER -