TY - JOUR
T1 - Integrated diagnostic strategy for the invasion depth of early gastric cancer by conventional endoscopy and EUS
AU - Tsujii, Yoshiki
AU - Kato, Motohiko
AU - Inoue, Takuya
AU - Yoshii, Shunsuke
AU - Nagai, Kengo
AU - Fujinaga, Tetsuji
AU - Maekawa, Akira
AU - Hayashi, Yoshito
AU - Akasaka, Tomofumi
AU - Shinzaki, Shinichiro
AU - Watabe, Kenji
AU - Nishida, Tsutomu
AU - Iijima, Hideki
AU - Tsujii, Masahiko
AU - Takehara, Tetsuo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Background Although conventional endoscopy (CE) and EUS are considered useful for predicting the invasion depth (T-staging) in early gastric cancer (EGC), no effective diagnostic strategy has been established. Objective To produce simple CE criteria and to elucidate an efficient diagnostic method by combining CE and EUS for accurate T-staging. Design Single-center retrospective analysis. Setting Academic university hospital. Patients Consecutive patients with EGC from April 2007 to March 2012 who underwent CE and EUS before treatment. Interventions Recorded endoscopic images were independently reviewed by 3 observers. The CE criteria for massive invasion were defined, and their utility and the additional value of EUS were assessed. Main Outcome Measurements The accuracy of CE based on the criteria and the accuracy of EUS. Results Two hundred thirty patients were enrolled: 195 with mucosal cancer or cancer in the submucosa less than 500 μm from the muscularis mucosae and 35 with invasive cancers. Multivariate analysis of the CE findings by 1 observer revealed that an irregular surface and a submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation were significantly associated with massive invasion. The simple CE criteria, consisting of those 2 features, had an overall accuracy of 73% to 82% and no significant differences in the diagnostic yield compared with EUS in all observers. CE accurately revealed mucosal cancer, and EUS efficiently salvaged the lesions that were over-diagnosed by CE. With our strategy, which involved the CE criteria and the optimal use of EUS, the comprehensive accuracy exceeded 85% in each observer. Limitations Retrospective, single-center study. Conclusions We demonstrated a practical strategy for T-staging in EGC using simple CE criteria and EUS.
AB - Background Although conventional endoscopy (CE) and EUS are considered useful for predicting the invasion depth (T-staging) in early gastric cancer (EGC), no effective diagnostic strategy has been established. Objective To produce simple CE criteria and to elucidate an efficient diagnostic method by combining CE and EUS for accurate T-staging. Design Single-center retrospective analysis. Setting Academic university hospital. Patients Consecutive patients with EGC from April 2007 to March 2012 who underwent CE and EUS before treatment. Interventions Recorded endoscopic images were independently reviewed by 3 observers. The CE criteria for massive invasion were defined, and their utility and the additional value of EUS were assessed. Main Outcome Measurements The accuracy of CE based on the criteria and the accuracy of EUS. Results Two hundred thirty patients were enrolled: 195 with mucosal cancer or cancer in the submucosa less than 500 μm from the muscularis mucosae and 35 with invasive cancers. Multivariate analysis of the CE findings by 1 observer revealed that an irregular surface and a submucosal tumor-like marginal elevation were significantly associated with massive invasion. The simple CE criteria, consisting of those 2 features, had an overall accuracy of 73% to 82% and no significant differences in the diagnostic yield compared with EUS in all observers. CE accurately revealed mucosal cancer, and EUS efficiently salvaged the lesions that were over-diagnosed by CE. With our strategy, which involved the CE criteria and the optimal use of EUS, the comprehensive accuracy exceeded 85% in each observer. Limitations Retrospective, single-center study. Conclusions We demonstrated a practical strategy for T-staging in EGC using simple CE criteria and EUS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939263217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939263217&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.022
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 25841580
AN - SCOPUS:84939263217
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 82
SP - 452
EP - 459
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 3
ER -