TY - JOUR
T1 - Interim evidence of the renoprotective effect of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus the calcium channel blocker amlodipine in patients with chronic kidney disease and hypertension
T2 - A report of the Japanese Losartan Therapy Intended for Global Renal Protection in Hypertensive Patients (JLIGHT) Study
AU - Iino, Yasuhiko
AU - Hayashi, Matsuhiko
AU - Kawamura, Tetsuya
AU - Shiigai, Tatsuo
AU - Tomino, Yasuhiko
AU - Yamada, Kenichi
AU - Kitajima, Takeyuki
AU - Ideura, Terukuni
AU - Koyama, Akio
AU - Sugisaki, Tetsuzo
AU - Suzuki, Hiromichi
AU - Umemura, Satoshi
AU - Kawaguchi, Yoshindo
AU - Uchida, Shunya
AU - Kuwahara, Michio
AU - Yamazaki, Tsutomu
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2003/9
Y1 - 2003/9
N2 - Background. Insufficiency of renal function and high blood pressure influence each other and eventually result in life-threatening endstage renal disease. It has been proposed that proteinuria per se is a determinant of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The therapeutic strategy for -patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension should therefore be targeted with a view not merely toward blood pressure reduction but also toward renoprotection. Methods. We examined the effect of the angiotensin (AT) 1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine, throughout a period of 12 months, on reduction of blood pressure and renoprotection. This was done by assessing amounts of urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine (SCr), and creatinine clearance (CCr) in patients with hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≧ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≧ 90 mmHg) and CKD (male, body weight [BW] ≧ 60kg: 1.5 ≦ SCr < 3.0 mg/dl; female or male BW < 60kg: 1.3 ≦ SCr < 3.0 mg/dl), manifesting proteinuria of 0.5 g or more/day. Losartan was administered once daily at doses of 25 to 100 mg/day, and amlodipine was given once daily at 2.5 to 5 mg/day. No antihypertensive combination therapy was allowed during the first 3-month period. Results. A 3-month interim analysis revealed that, despite there being no difference in blood pressure between the two groups, there was a significant reduction in 24-h urinary protein excretion in the losartan group (n = 43), but there was no change in the amlodipine group (n = 43). Analysis of stratified subgroups with proteinuria of 2 g or more/day and less than 2 g/day showed that losartan lowered proteinuria by approximately 24% in both subgroups, while amlodipine lowered proteinuria by 10%, but only in the subgroup of less than 2 g/day (NS). SCr and CCr did not change throughout the period of 3 months in either group. No severe or fatal adverse event was experienced in either group during the study period. Conclusions. Losartan appeared to be efficacious for renoprotection in patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension, with the mechanism being independent of its antihypertensive action.
AB - Background. Insufficiency of renal function and high blood pressure influence each other and eventually result in life-threatening endstage renal disease. It has been proposed that proteinuria per se is a determinant of the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The therapeutic strategy for -patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension should therefore be targeted with a view not merely toward blood pressure reduction but also toward renoprotection. Methods. We examined the effect of the angiotensin (AT) 1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine, throughout a period of 12 months, on reduction of blood pressure and renoprotection. This was done by assessing amounts of urinary protein excretion, serum creatinine (SCr), and creatinine clearance (CCr) in patients with hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≧ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≧ 90 mmHg) and CKD (male, body weight [BW] ≧ 60kg: 1.5 ≦ SCr < 3.0 mg/dl; female or male BW < 60kg: 1.3 ≦ SCr < 3.0 mg/dl), manifesting proteinuria of 0.5 g or more/day. Losartan was administered once daily at doses of 25 to 100 mg/day, and amlodipine was given once daily at 2.5 to 5 mg/day. No antihypertensive combination therapy was allowed during the first 3-month period. Results. A 3-month interim analysis revealed that, despite there being no difference in blood pressure between the two groups, there was a significant reduction in 24-h urinary protein excretion in the losartan group (n = 43), but there was no change in the amlodipine group (n = 43). Analysis of stratified subgroups with proteinuria of 2 g or more/day and less than 2 g/day showed that losartan lowered proteinuria by approximately 24% in both subgroups, while amlodipine lowered proteinuria by 10%, but only in the subgroup of less than 2 g/day (NS). SCr and CCr did not change throughout the period of 3 months in either group. No severe or fatal adverse event was experienced in either group during the study period. Conclusions. Losartan appeared to be efficacious for renoprotection in patients with proteinuric CKD and hypertension, with the mechanism being independent of its antihypertensive action.
KW - Amlodipine
KW - Angiotensin
KW - Creatinine
KW - Hypertension
KW - Kidney
KW - Losartan
KW - Proteinuria
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141960941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141960941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10157-003-0241-3
DO - 10.1007/s10157-003-0241-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 14586719
AN - SCOPUS:0141960941
SN - 1342-1751
VL - 7
SP - 221
EP - 230
JO - Clinical and experimental nephrology
JF - Clinical and experimental nephrology
IS - 3
ER -