TY - JOUR
T1 - Intervention and information effects at the individual level during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan
AU - Chang, Mateus Silva
AU - Yamamoto, Isamu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Chang, Yamamoto. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - This paper estimated the impact of intervention effects (state of emergency (SOE) or quasi-SOE requirements) and information effects (publicized increases in the number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and fear of infection) on preventive behaviors and telecommuting during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Japan Household Panel Survey. Our results indicated that SOEs and quasi-SOEs had positive effects on the adoption of preventive behaviors among individuals, including handwashing, which indicates that an SOE has a direct effect and an indirect effect. Although SOEs in Japan were less enforceable and more lenient than those in other countries, they still had a certain effect on people's adoption of preventive behaviors. However, the contribution of information effects was much larger than that of intervention effects, suggesting the importance of how and when information should be communicated to the public to prevent the spread of infection.
AB - This paper estimated the impact of intervention effects (state of emergency (SOE) or quasi-SOE requirements) and information effects (publicized increases in the number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and fear of infection) on preventive behaviors and telecommuting during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Japan Household Panel Survey. Our results indicated that SOEs and quasi-SOEs had positive effects on the adoption of preventive behaviors among individuals, including handwashing, which indicates that an SOE has a direct effect and an indirect effect. Although SOEs in Japan were less enforceable and more lenient than those in other countries, they still had a certain effect on people's adoption of preventive behaviors. However, the contribution of information effects was much larger than that of intervention effects, suggesting the importance of how and when information should be communicated to the public to prevent the spread of infection.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177790818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177790818&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0294189
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0294189
M3 - Article
C2 - 37983262
AN - SCOPUS:85177790818
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 11 November
M1 - e0294189
ER -