TY - JOUR
T1 - Intervention study of the effect of insulation retrofitting on home blood pressure inwinter
T2 - A nationwide SmartWellness Housing survey
AU - Umishio, Wataru
AU - Ikaga, Toshiharu
AU - Kario, Kazuomi
AU - Fujino, Yoshihisa
AU - Hoshi, Tanji
AU - Ando, Shintaro
AU - Suzuki, Masaru
AU - Yoshimura, Takesumi
AU - Yoshino, Hiroshi
AU - Murakami, Shuzo
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partly supported by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism as part of the Model Project for Promotion of SWH and a JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers JP17H06151: Principal Investigator: Prof. Toshi-haru Ikaga). Funding organizations had no role in deciding the study design and conducting the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation of the article; or the decision to submit the article for publication.
Funding Information:
T.I. has received research grants (significant) from Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd., Osaka Gas Co., Ltd., HyAS & Co. Inc., Fuyo Home Co. Ltd., Asahi Kasei Homes Corp., OM Solar Co. Inc., Kajima Corp., Shimizu Corp., Nice Corp., Japan Gas Association and Japan Sustainable Building Consortium. K.K. has received a research grant (significant) from Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd. T.H. has received honorarium (significant) from LIXIL Corp. M.S. has received nonrestrictive research funds (significant) from Taiyo Nippon Sanso Corp.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Objective: The WHO's Housing and health guidelines (2018) listed 'low indoor temperatures and insulation' as one of five priority areas, and indicated insulation retrofitting to help mitigate the effect of low indoor temperatures on health. However, there is still not enough evidence for the effect of insulation retrofitting based on an objective index. Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized controlled trial comparing home blood pressure (HBP) between insulation retrofitting (942 households and 1578 participants) and noninsulation retrofitting groups (67 households and 107 participants). HBP and indoor temperature were measured for 2 weeks before and after the intervention in winter. To examine the influence of insulation retrofitting on HBP, we used multiple linear regression analysis. Results: The analyses showed that indoor temperature in the morning rose by 1.48C after insulation retrofitting, despite a slight decrease in outdoor temperature by 0.28C. Insulation retrofitting significantly reduced morning home SBP (HSBP) by 3.1mmHg [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-4.6], morning home DBP (HDBP) by 2.1mmHg (95% CI: 1.1-3.2), evening HSBP by 1.8mmHg (95% CI: 0.2-3.4) and evening HDBP by 1.5mmHg (95% CI: 0.4-2.6). In addition, there was a dose-response relationship between indoor temperature and HBP, indicating the effectiveness of a significant improvement in the indoor thermal environment. Furthermore, there was heterogeneity in the effect of insulation retrofitting on morning HSBP in hypertensive patients compared with normotensive occupants (-7.7 versus-2.2 mmHg, P for interaction=0.043). Conclusion: Insulation retrofitting significantly reduced HBP and was more beneficial for reducing the morning HSBP of hypertensive patients.
AB - Objective: The WHO's Housing and health guidelines (2018) listed 'low indoor temperatures and insulation' as one of five priority areas, and indicated insulation retrofitting to help mitigate the effect of low indoor temperatures on health. However, there is still not enough evidence for the effect of insulation retrofitting based on an objective index. Methods: We conducted a nonrandomized controlled trial comparing home blood pressure (HBP) between insulation retrofitting (942 households and 1578 participants) and noninsulation retrofitting groups (67 households and 107 participants). HBP and indoor temperature were measured for 2 weeks before and after the intervention in winter. To examine the influence of insulation retrofitting on HBP, we used multiple linear regression analysis. Results: The analyses showed that indoor temperature in the morning rose by 1.48C after insulation retrofitting, despite a slight decrease in outdoor temperature by 0.28C. Insulation retrofitting significantly reduced morning home SBP (HSBP) by 3.1mmHg [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-4.6], morning home DBP (HDBP) by 2.1mmHg (95% CI: 1.1-3.2), evening HSBP by 1.8mmHg (95% CI: 0.2-3.4) and evening HDBP by 1.5mmHg (95% CI: 0.4-2.6). In addition, there was a dose-response relationship between indoor temperature and HBP, indicating the effectiveness of a significant improvement in the indoor thermal environment. Furthermore, there was heterogeneity in the effect of insulation retrofitting on morning HSBP in hypertensive patients compared with normotensive occupants (-7.7 versus-2.2 mmHg, P for interaction=0.043). Conclusion: Insulation retrofitting significantly reduced HBP and was more beneficial for reducing the morning HSBP of hypertensive patients.
KW - Home blood pressure
KW - Housing
KW - Indoor temperature
KW - Insulation retrofitting
KW - Intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095799910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095799910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002535
DO - 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002535
M3 - Article
C2 - 32555002
AN - SCOPUS:85095799910
SN - 0263-6352
VL - 38
SP - 2510
EP - 2518
JO - Journal of hypertension
JF - Journal of hypertension
IS - 12
ER -