TY - JOUR
T1 - Is Japanese Cell Manufacturing a new system?
T2 - A comparative study between Japanese Cell Manufacturing and Cellular Manufacturing
AU - Sakazume, Yu
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially supported by the MATCH project (SHEFC-HR04016, http://www.match-project. org.uk). Georgila is supported by the U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command (RDECOM). The content does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the U.S. Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - In this paper, the similarities and differences between Japanese Cell Manufacturing (JCM) and Cellular Manufacturing (CM) are compared in regard to the following four points: 1) implementation changes, 2) cell features, 3) advantages and disadvantages of implementation, and 4) mechanisms behind the advantages and disadvantages. The comparison made it clear that while some similarities exist in cell features and advantages and disadvantages of implementation, JCM and CM are completely different in terms of the implementation changes and mechanisms behind the advantages and disadvantages. CM is implemented as a result of shifting from a job shop to a flow shop, whereas JCM is implemented as a result of three changes in a flow shop. Based on these findings, it is possible to conclude that JCM is a new type of manufacturing system that should be considered separately from CM. However, existing studies that offer complex discussions of the similarities and differences of the two systems tend to focus on cell features and advantages of implementation. The fact that some similarities can be found in these two points could be the reason why JCM and CM are often considered to be the same.
AB - In this paper, the similarities and differences between Japanese Cell Manufacturing (JCM) and Cellular Manufacturing (CM) are compared in regard to the following four points: 1) implementation changes, 2) cell features, 3) advantages and disadvantages of implementation, and 4) mechanisms behind the advantages and disadvantages. The comparison made it clear that while some similarities exist in cell features and advantages and disadvantages of implementation, JCM and CM are completely different in terms of the implementation changes and mechanisms behind the advantages and disadvantages. CM is implemented as a result of shifting from a job shop to a flow shop, whereas JCM is implemented as a result of three changes in a flow shop. Based on these findings, it is possible to conclude that JCM is a new type of manufacturing system that should be considered separately from CM. However, existing studies that offer complex discussions of the similarities and differences of the two systems tend to focus on cell features and advantages of implementation. The fact that some similarities can be found in these two points could be the reason why JCM and CM are often considered to be the same.
KW - Cellular Manufacturing
KW - Implementation Changes
KW - Japanese Cell Manufacturing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25144478543&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25144478543&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:25144478543
SN - 1342-2618
VL - 55
SP - 341
EP - 349
JO - Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association
JF - Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association
IS - 6
ER -