Learning from extreme catastrophes

Shinichi Kamiya, Noriyoshi Yanase

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


This article studies the effects of direct and indirect loss experience of extreme catastrophes on expectations concerning the likelihood of future events by investigating the earthquake insurance take-up of Japanese households after the two costliest disasters in history. Direct loss experiences caused the strongest reactions to extreme catastrophes, whereas risk belief updates were a nationwide phenomenon. Sharing personalized information contributed to strong and persistent indirect experience effects. Investigating the effect of past quake experience on reaction to a new major quake, we find that both availability bias and representativeness help explain the effect of past loss experiences. Furthermore, the gambler’s fallacy, as proposed by Tversky and Kahneman (Psychological Bulletin 76(2), 105–110, 1971), appears to play an important role after an indirect experience with a 1000-year earthquake.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-124
Number of pages40
JournalJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Aug 1


  • Availability bias
  • Catastrophe
  • Earthquake
  • Insurance
  • Peer effects
  • Representativeness
  • Risk belief

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Learning from extreme catastrophes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this