Lessons from PROMINENT and prospects for pemafibrate

Jean Charles Fruchart, Jamila Fruchart-Najib, Shizuya Yamashita, Peter Libby, Koutaro Yokote, Tatsuhiko Kodama, Yohei Tomita, Paul M. Ridker, Michel P. Hermans, Alberto Zambon

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The neutral result of the PROMINENT trial has led to questions about the future for pemafibrate. This commentary discusses possible reasons for the lack of benefit observed in the trial. There were, however, indicators suggesting therapeutic potential in microvascular ischaemic complications associated with peripheral artery disease, with subsequent analysis showing reduction in the incidence of lower extremity ischaemic ulceration or gangrene. Reassurance about the safety of pemafibrate, together with emerging data from PROMINENT and experimental studies, also suggest benefit with pemafibrate in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (alternatively referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) and microangiopathy associated with diabetes, which merit further study.

Original languageEnglish
Article number279
JournalCardiovascular Diabetology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Dec

Keywords

  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • PROMINENT trial
  • Pemafibrate
  • Peripheral artery disease
  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lessons from PROMINENT and prospects for pemafibrate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this