TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Locally Resected High- and Low-Risk Rectal Carcinoid Tumors
AU - Shigeta, Kohei
AU - Okabayashi, Koji
AU - Hasegawa, Hirotoshi
AU - Ishii, Yoshiyuki
AU - Ochiai, Hiroki
AU - Tsuruta, Masashi
AU - Mukai, Makio
AU - Kameyama, Kaori
AU - Uraoka, Toshio
AU - Yahagi, Naohisa
AU - Kitagawa, Yuko
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Background: Tumor size and lymphovascular invasion are known high-risk factors for lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoid tumors. However, the optimal treatment for these tumors remains controversial. Aim: The aim of this paper is to compare the outcome of local or radical resection between patients with high-risk (tumor size >10 mm or lymphovascular invasion) disease and those with low-risk (tumor size ≤10 mm, no lymphovascular invasion) disease. Methods: Patients with rectal carcinoid tumors treated between January 1990 and March 2010 were identified retrospectively and classified into low- and high-risk groups. Results: In total, 83 patients with rectal carcinoid tumors were included, 53 (64 %) of whom were identified as low-risk and 30 (36 %) as high-risk. Local resection was performed in 50 (60 %) low-risk and 24 (29 %) high-risk patients, and postoperative recurrence was observed in one (1 %) of the high-risk patients who underwent local resection and one (11 %) who underwent radical resection. No recurrence was observed in the low-risk group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the patients who underwent local resection revealed that the 10-year disease-free survival rate was 100 % in the low-risk group and 83.3 % in the high-risk group. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in outcome between local and radical resection.
AB - Background: Tumor size and lymphovascular invasion are known high-risk factors for lymph node and distant metastasis in patients with rectal carcinoid tumors. However, the optimal treatment for these tumors remains controversial. Aim: The aim of this paper is to compare the outcome of local or radical resection between patients with high-risk (tumor size >10 mm or lymphovascular invasion) disease and those with low-risk (tumor size ≤10 mm, no lymphovascular invasion) disease. Methods: Patients with rectal carcinoid tumors treated between January 1990 and March 2010 were identified retrospectively and classified into low- and high-risk groups. Results: In total, 83 patients with rectal carcinoid tumors were included, 53 (64 %) of whom were identified as low-risk and 30 (36 %) as high-risk. Local resection was performed in 50 (60 %) low-risk and 24 (29 %) high-risk patients, and postoperative recurrence was observed in one (1 %) of the high-risk patients who underwent local resection and one (11 %) who underwent radical resection. No recurrence was observed in the low-risk group. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the patients who underwent local resection revealed that the 10-year disease-free survival rate was 100 % in the low-risk group and 83.3 % in the high-risk group. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in outcome between local and radical resection.
KW - Local resection
KW - Rectal carcinoid tumors
KW - Survival outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896545571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896545571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11605-014-2468-6
DO - 10.1007/s11605-014-2468-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 24519035
AN - SCOPUS:84896545571
SN - 1091-255X
VL - 18
SP - 768
EP - 773
JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
IS - 4
ER -