Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Machine learning evaluation of intensified conditioning on haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

  • Tomoyasu Jo
  • , Kosuke Inoue
  • , Tomoaki Ueda
  • , Makoto Iwasaki
  • , Yu Akahoshi
  • , Satoshi Nishiwaki
  • , Hiroki Hatsusawa
  • , Tetsuya Nishida
  • , Naoyuki Uchida
  • , Ayumu Ito
  • , Masatsugu Tanaka
  • , Satoru Takada
  • , Toshiro Kawakita
  • , Shuichi Ota
  • , Yuta Katayama
  • , Satoshi Takahashi
  • , Makoto Onizuka
  • , Yuta Hasegawa
  • , Keisuke Kataoka
  • , Yoshinobu Kanda
  • Takahiro Fukuda, Ken Tabuchi, Yoshiko Atsuta, Yasuyuki Arai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The advantage of intensified myeloablative conditioning (MAC) over standard MAC has not been determined in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients. Methods: To evaluate heterogeneous effects of intensified MAC among individuals, we analyzed the registry database of adult ALL patients between 2000 and 2021. After propensity score matching, we applied a machine-learning Bayesian causal forest algorithm to develop a prediction model of individualized treatment effect (ITE) of intensified MAC on reduction in overall mortality at 1 year after HSCT. Results: Among 2440 propensity score-matched patients, our model shows heterogeneity in the association between intensified MAC and 1-year overall mortality. Individuals in the high-benefit group (n = 1220), defined as those with ITEs greater than the median, are more likely to be younger, male, and to have higher refined Disease Risk Index (rDRI), T-cell phenotype, and grafts from related donors than those in the low-benefit group (n = 1220). The high-benefit approach (applying intensified MAC to individuals in the high-benefit group) shows the largest reduction in overall mortality at 1 year (risk difference [95% confidence interval], +5.94 percentage points [0.88 to 10.51], p = 0.011). In contrast, the high-risk approach (targeting patients with high or very high rDRI) does not achieve statistical significance (risk difference [95% confidence interval], +3.85 percentage points [−1.11 to 7.90], p = 0.063). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the high-benefit approach, targeting patients expected to benefit from intensified MAC, has the capacity to maximize HSCT effectiveness using intensified MAC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number247
JournalCommunications Medicine
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Dec

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Internal Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Assessment and Diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Machine learning evaluation of intensified conditioning on haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this