TY - JOUR
T1 - Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia
AU - Nakajima, Hideo
AU - Sakamoto, Yoshiaki
AU - Tamada, Ikkei
AU - Ogata, Hisao
AU - Kishi, Kazuo
AU - Sakamoto, Teruo
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment - especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored.
AB - We treat hemifacial microsomia with a combination of surgery and orthodontic treatment during the growth period, resulting in early improvement in facial asymmetry and the induction of normal growth. We previously used gradual distraction of the mandibular ramus for Pruzansky's type II classification (Pruzansky, 1969). In type II cases, the maxilla should also be treated actively as, using this technique, improvement of the occlusal plane is difficult to achieve, resulting in a cross bite and difficulties in post-operative orthodontic treatment - especially in older patients. Morphologically, the mandibular angle region of the operative side is flat, and the angle of the mouth remains elevated. We performed mandibular-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction while the occlusion was maintained using intermaxillary anchorage. However, mandibular-driven distraction tended to elongate the face because the mandible only elongated downwards and the mandibular ramus did not reach the glenoid. Furthermore, external distraction devices produce significant distress for patients until removal of the device and cause scars on the face. We developed a new internal distraction device with a variable angle and performed maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction using this device. The result was morphologically satisfactory and solved the above problems. Because the patient was in the growth period, careful follow-up and induction to normal growth were important while the inferior growth of the affected side was monitored.
KW - Distraction osteogenesis
KW - Hemifacial microsomia
KW - Internal distraction device
KW - Simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055052215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055052215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.017
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.11.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 21195627
AN - SCOPUS:80055052215
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 39
SP - 549
EP - 553
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 8
ER -