TY - JOUR
T1 - Model-guided antipsychotic dose reduction in schizophrenia
T2 - A pilot, single-blind randomized controlled trial
AU - Ozawa, Chisa
AU - Bies, Robert R.
AU - Pillai, Nikhil
AU - Suzuki, Takefumi
AU - Mimura, Masaru
AU - Uchida, Hiroyuki
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; †Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Computational and Data Enabled Sciences Program, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY; ‡Department of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Ethics, University of YamanashiChuo-shi, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan; and §Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Received October 11, 2018; accepted after revision March 15, 2019. Reprints: Hiroyuki Uchida, MD, PhD, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35, Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan (e‐mail: hiroyuki.uchida.hu@gmail.com). This study was funded by the Nakatomi Foundation and Keio Fukuzawa Fund. Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citation appears in the printed text and is provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.psychopharmacology.com). Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0271-0749 DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001046
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Purpose/Background Patients with schizophrenia as well as their psychiatrists are hesitant to reduce the antipsychotic dose in fear of relapse. To overcome such dilemmas, we developed models to individually calculate an oral dose that corresponds to a given target dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. Methods/Procedures In this pilot, 52-week single-blind randomized controlled trial, 35 clinically stable patients with schizophrenia receiving either risperidone or olanzapine monotherapy were randomly assigned to dose reduction (n = 17) or dose maintenance group (n = 18). In the former group, baseline doses were reduced to the doses corresponding to 65% D2 occupancy (the lower end of therapeutic window) at trough that were calculated from randomly collected plasma concentrations using our models. Findings/Results In the dose reduction group, doses of risperidone and olanzapine were decreased from 4.2 ± 1.9 to 1.4 ± 0.4 and 12.8 ± 3.9 to 6.7 ± 1.8 mg/d, whereas the doses in the dose maintenance group were 4.3 ± 1.9 and 15.8 ± 4.6 mg/d, respectively. Twelve subjects (70.5%) and 13 subjects (72.2%) in the dose reduction and dose maintenance groups completed the study (P = 0.604), whereas 3 subjects (18.8%) and none dropped out because of clinical worsening in the dose reduction and dose maintenance groups, respectively. There were not significant differences in score changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale between the 2 groups but in Positive subscale scores in the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (0.4 ± 0.7 in the dose reduction group vs -0.1 ± 0.7 in the dose maintenance group, P = 0.029). Implications/Conclusions Although our model-guided dose reduction strategy was found to be comparable with no-dose change in terms of dropout rates, safety issues have to be further examined.
AB - Purpose/Background Patients with schizophrenia as well as their psychiatrists are hesitant to reduce the antipsychotic dose in fear of relapse. To overcome such dilemmas, we developed models to individually calculate an oral dose that corresponds to a given target dopamine D2 receptor occupancy. Methods/Procedures In this pilot, 52-week single-blind randomized controlled trial, 35 clinically stable patients with schizophrenia receiving either risperidone or olanzapine monotherapy were randomly assigned to dose reduction (n = 17) or dose maintenance group (n = 18). In the former group, baseline doses were reduced to the doses corresponding to 65% D2 occupancy (the lower end of therapeutic window) at trough that were calculated from randomly collected plasma concentrations using our models. Findings/Results In the dose reduction group, doses of risperidone and olanzapine were decreased from 4.2 ± 1.9 to 1.4 ± 0.4 and 12.8 ± 3.9 to 6.7 ± 1.8 mg/d, whereas the doses in the dose maintenance group were 4.3 ± 1.9 and 15.8 ± 4.6 mg/d, respectively. Twelve subjects (70.5%) and 13 subjects (72.2%) in the dose reduction and dose maintenance groups completed the study (P = 0.604), whereas 3 subjects (18.8%) and none dropped out because of clinical worsening in the dose reduction and dose maintenance groups, respectively. There were not significant differences in score changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale between the 2 groups but in Positive subscale scores in the Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (0.4 ± 0.7 in the dose reduction group vs -0.1 ± 0.7 in the dose maintenance group, P = 0.029). Implications/Conclusions Although our model-guided dose reduction strategy was found to be comparable with no-dose change in terms of dropout rates, safety issues have to be further examined.
KW - antipsychotic
KW - dopamine D receptor
KW - maintenance treatment
KW - schizophrenia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068693987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068693987&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001046
DO - 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001046
M3 - Article
C2 - 31188232
AN - SCOPUS:85068693987
SN - 0271-0749
VL - 39
SP - 329
EP - 335
JO - Journal of clinical psychopharmacology
JF - Journal of clinical psychopharmacology
IS - 4
ER -