TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural circuits in the brain that are activated when mitigating criminal sentences
AU - Yamada, Makiko
AU - Camerer, Colin F.
AU - Fujie, Saori
AU - Kato, Motoichiro
AU - Matsuda, Tetsuya
AU - Takano, Harumasa
AU - Ito, Hiroshi
AU - Suhara, Tetsuya
AU - Takahashi, Hidehiko
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank T. Kouchiyama for his advice in designing the task, and K. Suzuki and I. Izumida for their help as clinical research coordinators. This study was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI 22791156, 23680045, MEXT Tamagawa University GCOE, MEXT SRPBS, MEXT KAKENHI 23011005, 23120009.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In sentencing guilty defendants, jurors and judges weigh 'mitigating circumstances', which create sympathy for a defendant. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure neural activity in ordinary citizens who are potential jurors, as they decide on mitigation of punishment for murder. We found that sympathy activated regions associated with mentalising and moral conflict (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, precuneus and temporo-parietal junction). Sentencing also activated precuneus and anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting that mitigation is based on negative affective responses to murder, sympathy for mitigating circumstances and cognitive control to choose numerical punishments. Individual differences on the inclination to mitigate, the sentence reduction per unit of judged sympathy, correlated with activity in the right middle insula, an area known to represent interoception of visceral states. These results could help the legal system understand how potential jurors actually decide, and contribute to growing knowledge about whether emotion and cognition are integrated sensibly in difficult judgments.
AB - In sentencing guilty defendants, jurors and judges weigh 'mitigating circumstances', which create sympathy for a defendant. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure neural activity in ordinary citizens who are potential jurors, as they decide on mitigation of punishment for murder. We found that sympathy activated regions associated with mentalising and moral conflict (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, precuneus and temporo-parietal junction). Sentencing also activated precuneus and anterior cingulate cortex, suggesting that mitigation is based on negative affective responses to murder, sympathy for mitigating circumstances and cognitive control to choose numerical punishments. Individual differences on the inclination to mitigate, the sentence reduction per unit of judged sympathy, correlated with activity in the right middle insula, an area known to represent interoception of visceral states. These results could help the legal system understand how potential jurors actually decide, and contribute to growing knowledge about whether emotion and cognition are integrated sensibly in difficult judgments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859188266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859188266&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/ncomms1757
DO - 10.1038/ncomms1757
M3 - Article
C2 - 22453832
AN - SCOPUS:84859188266
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 3
JO - Nature communications
JF - Nature communications
M1 - 759
ER -