TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-zero-sum microbiome immune system interactions
AU - Tuganbaev, Timur
AU - Honda, Kenya
N1 - Funding Information:
In addition to gut intrinsic neurons, the intestine is innervated by different classes of extrinsic neurons, which detect and convey the information within the gut to the extrinsic ganglia and the CNS. Extrinsic ganglia, such as the sensory nodose ganglion and dorsal root ganglion, and the sympathetic coeliac‐superior mesenteric ganglia project neurons to the gut [ 80 ]. Complementary to the intrinsic ENS, gut‐extrinsic neurons are also involved in control of the mucosal immune system. For instance, transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) nociceptor neurons projected from the dorsal root ganglion respond to a infection by releasing a neuropeptide calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) and thus suppressing the differentiation of ileum M cells to block further entry of [ 8 ]. The reduction in M cell density also leads to an increase in mucosal colonization by SFB, which competes with for mucosal ecological niches, resulting in further limitation of infection [ 8 ]. While extrinsic neurons regulate infections, their homeostasis is supported by the commensal microbiome. Indeed, the commensal microbiome plays an important role in preventing aberrant activation of the sympathetic neurons in the coeliac‐superior mesenteric ganglia [ 80 ]. In this preventive mechanism, nodose sensory neurons detect microbiome‐derived SCFAs and transmit suppressive signals to sympathetic neurons [ 80 ]. Epithelial cell subsets, particularly enteroendocrine cells, have also been implicated in transmitting luminal input to the intrinsic and extrinsic ENS. Mechanistically, enteroendocrine cells may communicate with the ENS directly via synapse‐like innervation [ 21 ] or via enteroendocrine hormone signaling in ENS neurons, as was recently predicted by a single cell survey of the mouse and human ENS [ 68 ]. This prediction was recently validated by the demonstration that glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) can activate gut sympathetic neurons [ 80 ]. Therefore, homeostatic communication in the intestine involves contributions by the gut microbiome, epithelium, ENS, CNS, and the immune system. + Salmonella typhimurium Salmonella Salmonella Salmonella
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Immunology published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Fundamental asymmetries between the host and its microbiome in enzymatic activities and nutrient storage capabilities have promoted mutualistic adaptations on both sides. As a result, the enteric immune system has evolved so as not to cause a zero-sum sterilization of non-self, but rather achieve a non-zero-sum self-reinforcing cooperation with its evolutionary partner the microbiome. In this review, we attempt to integrate the accumulated knowledge of immune—microbiome interactions into an evolutionary framework and trace the pattern of positive immune—microbiome feedback loops across epithelial, enteric nervous system, innate, and adaptive immune circuits. Indeed, the immune system requires commensal signals for its development and function, and reciprocally protects the microbiome from nutrient shortage and pathogen outgrowth. In turn, a healthy microbiome is the result of immune system curatorship as well as microbial ecology. The paradigms of host–microbiome asymmetry and the cooperative nature of their interactions identified in the gut are applicable across all tissues influenced by microbial activities. Incorporation of immune system influences into models of microbiome ecology will be a step forward toward defining what constitutes a healthy human microbiome and guide discoveries of novel host–microbiome mutualistic adaptations that may be harnessed for the promotion of human health.
AB - Fundamental asymmetries between the host and its microbiome in enzymatic activities and nutrient storage capabilities have promoted mutualistic adaptations on both sides. As a result, the enteric immune system has evolved so as not to cause a zero-sum sterilization of non-self, but rather achieve a non-zero-sum self-reinforcing cooperation with its evolutionary partner the microbiome. In this review, we attempt to integrate the accumulated knowledge of immune—microbiome interactions into an evolutionary framework and trace the pattern of positive immune—microbiome feedback loops across epithelial, enteric nervous system, innate, and adaptive immune circuits. Indeed, the immune system requires commensal signals for its development and function, and reciprocally protects the microbiome from nutrient shortage and pathogen outgrowth. In turn, a healthy microbiome is the result of immune system curatorship as well as microbial ecology. The paradigms of host–microbiome asymmetry and the cooperative nature of their interactions identified in the gut are applicable across all tissues influenced by microbial activities. Incorporation of immune system influences into models of microbiome ecology will be a step forward toward defining what constitutes a healthy human microbiome and guide discoveries of novel host–microbiome mutualistic adaptations that may be harnessed for the promotion of human health.
KW - enteric nervous system
KW - gut-brain axis
KW - immune system
KW - microbiome
KW - mutualism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111429415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111429415&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eji.202049065
DO - 10.1002/eji.202049065
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34242413
AN - SCOPUS:85111429415
SN - 0014-2980
VL - 51
SP - 2120
EP - 2136
JO - European Journal of Immunology
JF - European Journal of Immunology
IS - 9
ER -