TY - JOUR
T1 - Nudging patients with chronic kidney disease at screening to visit physicians
T2 - A protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
AU - Fukuma, Shingo
AU - Ikenoue, Tatsuyoshi
AU - Sasaki, Shusaku
AU - Saigusa, Yusuke
AU - Misumi, Toshihiro
AU - Saito, Yoshiyuki
AU - Yamada, Yukari
AU - Goto, Rei
AU - Taguri, Masataka
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant number: 16K19251). The funding sources had no involvement in conducting the study. We appreciate the Health Insurance Association for Architecture and Civil Engineering companies (Kunio Mizuta and Akio Yoda) for providing great support in the cooperation with health promotion activities. We also appreciate Cancer Scan Co. Ltd. (Akio Yonekura, Maiko Amino, and Yuhei Fujioka) for greatly contributing in the intervention program as a service contractor for the health promotion activity by the Health Insurance Association.
Funding Information:
This work is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (grant number: 16K19251 ). The funding sources had no involvement in conducting the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Background/Aims: Strategies for an effective intervention after chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening have not been well examined. We describe the rationale and design of a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the effect of a behavioral intervention using the nudge approach in behavioral economics on CKD patients’ visiting behaviors to physicians and change in their kidney function after CKD screening. Methods: The RCT will include CKD patients (N = 4500) detected at screening (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.74 m2 or urine protein ≥1+), aged 40–63 years. The two intervention groups will receive a “usual letter” and “nudge-based letter,” while the control group will only receive a conventional follow-up. Our primary outcome is proportion of patients’ visiting physicians for 6 months after the intervention; the secondary outcome is change in the eGFR at 2 years after the intervention. Results: We developed an efficient intervention program after CKD screening and designed the pragmatic RCT to assess its effectiveness in the real world. Our trial is unique in that it investigates the effect of the nudge approach in behavioral economics. By the end of 2018, we have enrolled 1,692 participants, and randomized 677 participants into the usual letter group, 677 participants into the nudge-based letter group, and 338 participants into the control group. We have confirmed that health checkup data could identify a large number of eligible participants. Conclusion: The trial's results will contribute to filling in the gap between screening and subsequent medical interventions for preventing CKD progression.
AB - Background/Aims: Strategies for an effective intervention after chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening have not been well examined. We describe the rationale and design of a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the effect of a behavioral intervention using the nudge approach in behavioral economics on CKD patients’ visiting behaviors to physicians and change in their kidney function after CKD screening. Methods: The RCT will include CKD patients (N = 4500) detected at screening (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 mL/min/1.74 m2 or urine protein ≥1+), aged 40–63 years. The two intervention groups will receive a “usual letter” and “nudge-based letter,” while the control group will only receive a conventional follow-up. Our primary outcome is proportion of patients’ visiting physicians for 6 months after the intervention; the secondary outcome is change in the eGFR at 2 years after the intervention. Results: We developed an efficient intervention program after CKD screening and designed the pragmatic RCT to assess its effectiveness in the real world. Our trial is unique in that it investigates the effect of the nudge approach in behavioral economics. By the end of 2018, we have enrolled 1,692 participants, and randomized 677 participants into the usual letter group, 677 participants into the nudge-based letter group, and 338 participants into the control group. We have confirmed that health checkup data could identify a large number of eligible participants. Conclusion: The trial's results will contribute to filling in the gap between screening and subsequent medical interventions for preventing CKD progression.
KW - Behavioral intervention
KW - Chronic kidney disease
KW - Nudge
KW - Pragmatic trial
KW - Screening
KW - Visiting behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071321672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071321672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100429
DO - 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100429
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071321672
SN - 2451-8654
VL - 16
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
M1 - 100429
ER -