TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced uterine carcinosarcoma
T2 - A multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese gynecologic oncology group
AU - Harano, Kenichi
AU - Hirakawa, Akihiro
AU - Yunokawa, Mayu
AU - Nakamura, Toshiaki
AU - Satoh, Toyomi
AU - Nishikawa, Tadaaki
AU - Aoki, Daisuke
AU - Ito, Kimihiko
AU - Ito, Kiyoshi
AU - Nakanishi, Toru
AU - Susumu, Nobuyuki
AU - Takehara, Kazuhiro
AU - Watanabe, Yoh
AU - Watari, Hidemichi
AU - Saito, Toshiaki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2016/6
Y1 - 2016/6
N2 - Background The benefits of cytoreductive surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of optimal surgery on advanced UCS patient survival. Methods We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study of women diagnosed with stage III–IV UCS between 2007 and 2012. Data were obtained retrospectively from medical records, including demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome information. Optimal cytoreductive surgery was defined as surgery resulting in a maximum residual tumor of ≤ 1 cm. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the Cox regression model was used to examine the impact of selected factors on survival. Results A total of 225 UCS patients (median age, 63 years) were identified, including 136 (60%) with stage III and 89 (40%) with stage IV disease. Among these patients, 170 (76%) received optimal cytoreductive surgery. The median follow-up time was 19 months. The median PFS was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6–13.4) and 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.1–9.5) for patients who received optimal and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median OS was 37.9 months (95% CI, 28.3–not reached) and 18 months (95% CI, 9.6–21) for patients who received optimal and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, respectively (P < 0.0001). Residual tumor > 1 cm was associated with worse OS while pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with improved OS. Conclusion Optimal cytoreductive surgery and pelvic lymph node dissection are associated with improved OS in advanced UCS patients.
AB - Background The benefits of cytoreductive surgery for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of optimal surgery on advanced UCS patient survival. Methods We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study of women diagnosed with stage III–IV UCS between 2007 and 2012. Data were obtained retrospectively from medical records, including demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome information. Optimal cytoreductive surgery was defined as surgery resulting in a maximum residual tumor of ≤ 1 cm. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the Cox regression model was used to examine the impact of selected factors on survival. Results A total of 225 UCS patients (median age, 63 years) were identified, including 136 (60%) with stage III and 89 (40%) with stage IV disease. Among these patients, 170 (76%) received optimal cytoreductive surgery. The median follow-up time was 19 months. The median PFS was 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6–13.4) and 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.1–9.5) for patients who received optimal and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, respectively (P < 0.0001). The median OS was 37.9 months (95% CI, 28.3–not reached) and 18 months (95% CI, 9.6–21) for patients who received optimal and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, respectively (P < 0.0001). Residual tumor > 1 cm was associated with worse OS while pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with improved OS. Conclusion Optimal cytoreductive surgery and pelvic lymph node dissection are associated with improved OS in advanced UCS patients.
KW - Cytoreductive surgery
KW - Pelvic lymph node dissection
KW - Uterine carcinosarcoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963629067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963629067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 27072806
AN - SCOPUS:84963629067
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 141
SP - 447
EP - 453
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 3
ER -