TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathways of Progression From Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on Molecular Features
AU - Omori, Yuko
AU - Ono, Yusuke
AU - Tanino, Mishie
AU - Karasaki, Hidenori
AU - Yamaguchi, Hiroshi
AU - Furukawa, Toru
AU - Enomoto, Katsuro
AU - Ueda, Jun
AU - Sumi, Atsuko
AU - Katayama, Jin
AU - Muraki, Miho
AU - Taniue, Kenzui
AU - Takahashi, Kuniyuki
AU - Ambo, Yoshiyasu
AU - Shinohara, Toshiya
AU - Nishihara, Hiroshi
AU - Sasajima, Junpei
AU - Maguchi, Hiroyuki
AU - Mizukami, Yusuke
AU - Okumura, Toshikatsu
AU - Tanaka, Shinya
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (grant numbers 25461029 and 17K09472 to Yusuke Mizukami and 15K14716 to Yusuke Ono) and by the Pancreas Research Foundation of Japan (to Yuko Omori and Yusuke Mizukami).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 AGA Institute
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Background & Aims: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are regarded as precursors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs), but little is known about the mechanism of progression. This makes it challenging to assess cancer risk in patients with IPMNs. We investigated associations of IPMNs with concurrent PDAs by genetic and histologic analyses. Methods: We obtained 30 pancreatic tissues with concurrent PDAs and IPMNs, and 168 lesions, including incipient foci, were mapped, microdissected, and analyzed for mutations in 18 pancreatic cancer-associated genes and expression of tumor suppressors. Results: We determined the clonal relatedness of lesions, based on driver mutations shared by PDAs and concurrent IPMNs, and classified the lesions into 3 subtypes. Twelve PDAs contained driver mutations shared by all concurrent IPMNs, which we called the sequential subtype. This subset was characterized by less diversity in incipient foci with frequent GNAS mutations. Eleven PDAs contained some driver mutations that were shared with concurrent IPMNs, which we called the branch-off subtype. In this subtype, PDAs and IPMNs had identical KRAS mutations but different GNAS mutations, although the lesions were adjacent. Whole-exome sequencing and methylation analysis of these lesions indicated clonal origin with later divergence. Ten PDAs had driver mutations not found in concurrent IPMNs, called the de novo subtype. Expression profiles of TP53 and SMAD4 increased our ability to differentiate these subtypes compared with sequencing data alone. The branch-off and de novo subtypes had substantial heterogeneity among early clones, such as differences in KRAS mutations. Patients with PDAs of the branch-off subtype had a longer times of disease-free survival than patients with PDAs of the de novo or the sequential subtypes. Conclusions: Detailed histologic and genetic analysis of PDAs and concurrent IPMNs identified 3 different pathways by which IPMNs progress to PDAs—we call these the sequential, branch-off, and de novo subtypes. Subtypes might be associated with clinical and pathologic features and be used to select surveillance programs for patients with IPMNs.
AB - Background & Aims: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are regarded as precursors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAs), but little is known about the mechanism of progression. This makes it challenging to assess cancer risk in patients with IPMNs. We investigated associations of IPMNs with concurrent PDAs by genetic and histologic analyses. Methods: We obtained 30 pancreatic tissues with concurrent PDAs and IPMNs, and 168 lesions, including incipient foci, were mapped, microdissected, and analyzed for mutations in 18 pancreatic cancer-associated genes and expression of tumor suppressors. Results: We determined the clonal relatedness of lesions, based on driver mutations shared by PDAs and concurrent IPMNs, and classified the lesions into 3 subtypes. Twelve PDAs contained driver mutations shared by all concurrent IPMNs, which we called the sequential subtype. This subset was characterized by less diversity in incipient foci with frequent GNAS mutations. Eleven PDAs contained some driver mutations that were shared with concurrent IPMNs, which we called the branch-off subtype. In this subtype, PDAs and IPMNs had identical KRAS mutations but different GNAS mutations, although the lesions were adjacent. Whole-exome sequencing and methylation analysis of these lesions indicated clonal origin with later divergence. Ten PDAs had driver mutations not found in concurrent IPMNs, called the de novo subtype. Expression profiles of TP53 and SMAD4 increased our ability to differentiate these subtypes compared with sequencing data alone. The branch-off and de novo subtypes had substantial heterogeneity among early clones, such as differences in KRAS mutations. Patients with PDAs of the branch-off subtype had a longer times of disease-free survival than patients with PDAs of the de novo or the sequential subtypes. Conclusions: Detailed histologic and genetic analysis of PDAs and concurrent IPMNs identified 3 different pathways by which IPMNs progress to PDAs—we call these the sequential, branch-off, and de novo subtypes. Subtypes might be associated with clinical and pathologic features and be used to select surveillance programs for patients with IPMNs.
KW - Pancreas
KW - Progression Model
KW - Risk Prediction
KW - Tumorigenesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060994130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060994130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.029
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 30342036
AN - SCOPUS:85060994130
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 156
SP - 647-661.e2
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 3
ER -