TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential benefits of immunomodulator use with vedolizumab for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
AU - Naganuma, Makoto
AU - Watanabe, Kenji
AU - Motoya, Satoshi
AU - Ogata, Haruhiko
AU - Matsui, Toshiyuki
AU - Suzuki, Yasuo
AU - Ursos, Lyann
AU - Sakamoto, Shigeru
AU - Shikamura, Mitsuhiro
AU - Hori, Tetsuharu
AU - Fernandez, Jovelle
AU - Watanabe, Mamoru
AU - Hibi, Toshifumi
AU - Kanai, Takanori
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank the patients, their families, the investigators, and staff who participated in the study. The authors are also grateful to the following colleagues at Takeda Pharmaceutical Company: Akira Nishimura, Yutaka Aritomi, and Kazunori Oda for study protocol development; Takahiro Araki for collection and assembly of the data; Mitsuhiro Mori and Yuya Mori for patient enrollment; Masataka Igeta and Kenkichi Sugiura for reviewing the study protocol/CSR review/SAP development and for statistical analysis; and Philippe Pinton for interpretation. The authors would like to acknowledge medical writing support of Nicholas Crabb, MSc, of FireKite, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare plc, during the development of this paper, which was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited in compliance with Good Publication Practice 3 ethical guidelines (Battisti WP, . Ann Intern Med 2015;163:461–464). et al
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Medical writing support was funded by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Financial support:
Funding Information:
M. N. has received research funding from EA Pharma (EA) and Mochida Pharmaceutical (Mochida) and honoraria from Pfizer Japan (Pfizer) and Takeda Pharmaceutical (Takeda). S. M. has received honoraria and research funding from Janssen and Takeda, honoraria from Mitsubishi Tanabe and Mochida, and research funding from Pfizer. H. O. has received honoraria from Takeda and research funding from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Mochida, Pfizer, and AbbVie. T. K. has received honoraria and research funding from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Miyarisan Pharmaceutical (Miyarisan), and Takeda; honoraria from Astellas and AstraZeneca; and research funding from EN Otsuka, Ezaki Glico, Otsuka, AbbVie, Mochida, Kyorin, Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon Kayaku, Yakult, Zeria, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, EA, Eisai, JIMRO, Chugai Pharmaceutical (Chugai), and UCB Japan (UCB). T. M. has received honoraria and research funding from EA, Ajinomoto Seiyaku (Ajinomoto), AbbVie, Eisai, Kyorin, Zeria, Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe, and Mochida and research funding from Miyarisan, Otsuka, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, AstraZeneca, MSD, JIMRO, Taiho Pharmaceutical (Taiho), Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, UCB, and Chugai. Y. S. has received honoraria and research funding from Mitsubishi Tanabe, AbbVie, EA, and Mochida; honoraria from Janssen, Zeria, and Kyorin; and research funding from JIMRO, Kissei, and Nippon Kayaku. L. U., S. S., M. S., T. Hori, and J. F. are employees of Takeda. J. F. owns restricted stocks in Takeda and GSK. T. Hibi has received honoraria and research funding from AbbVie, JIMRO, and Zeria; honoraria from Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Aspen Japan, Ferring, Gilead Sciences, Kissei, Mochida, Nippon Kayaku, Janssen, and Pfizer; and research funding from EA and Otsuka. M. W. has received honoraria and research funding from Mitsubishi Tanabe, Takeda, EA, Zeria, and Gilead Sciences; honoraria from Ajinomoto, Janssen, Celltrion Healthcare, and Pfizer; and research funding from Nippon Kayaku, Mochida, Kissei, Miyarisan, Asahi Kasei, JIMRO, Kyorin, AbbVie, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Alfresa Pharma, Ayumi Pharmaceutical, Astellas, MSD, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho, Toray Industries, Chugai, and Fujirebio. Declaration of conflict of interest:
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background and Aim: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab treatment with or without concomitant immunomodulator use in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Methods: Among enrolled patients in a phase 3 study conducted in Japan (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02039505), data from patients allocated to 300-mg intravenous vedolizumab for induction and maintenance phases were used for this exploratory analysis. Efficacy endpoints were clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing at week 10 and clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 60, and disease worsening and treatment failure during the maintenance phase. Results: At week 10, the differences in clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing rates between the subgroups (those with concomitant immunomodulator use minus those without) were 0.7 (95% confidence interval: −14.3, 15.7), 3.3 (95% confidence interval: −8.5, 15.2), and 1.8 (95% confidence interval: −13.0, 16.5), respectively. At week 60, the differences in clinical remission and mucosal healing between the subgroups with and without concomitant immunomodulator use were 26.1 (95% confidence interval: −3.5, 55.6) and 29.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 58.4), respectively. The proportions of patients without treatment failure at day 330 of the maintenance phase were 90.7% with concomitant immunomodulator use and 73.7% without. No marked differences in incidence of infections were observed between subgroups. Conclusions: This study suggested the possibility that concomitant immunomodulator use may be beneficial to maintain the clinical efficacy of vedolizumab.
AB - Background and Aim: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab treatment with or without concomitant immunomodulator use in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Methods: Among enrolled patients in a phase 3 study conducted in Japan (clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02039505), data from patients allocated to 300-mg intravenous vedolizumab for induction and maintenance phases were used for this exploratory analysis. Efficacy endpoints were clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing at week 10 and clinical remission and mucosal healing at week 60, and disease worsening and treatment failure during the maintenance phase. Results: At week 10, the differences in clinical response, clinical remission, and mucosal healing rates between the subgroups (those with concomitant immunomodulator use minus those without) were 0.7 (95% confidence interval: −14.3, 15.7), 3.3 (95% confidence interval: −8.5, 15.2), and 1.8 (95% confidence interval: −13.0, 16.5), respectively. At week 60, the differences in clinical remission and mucosal healing between the subgroups with and without concomitant immunomodulator use were 26.1 (95% confidence interval: −3.5, 55.6) and 29.9 (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 58.4), respectively. The proportions of patients without treatment failure at day 330 of the maintenance phase were 90.7% with concomitant immunomodulator use and 73.7% without. No marked differences in incidence of infections were observed between subgroups. Conclusions: This study suggested the possibility that concomitant immunomodulator use may be beneficial to maintain the clinical efficacy of vedolizumab.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114458264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85114458264&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jgh.15667
DO - 10.1111/jgh.15667
M3 - Article
C2 - 34409654
AN - SCOPUS:85114458264
SN - 0815-9319
VL - 37
SP - 81
EP - 88
JO - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
JF - Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
IS - 1
ER -