TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictors of technical difficulty for complete closure of mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic resection
AU - Mizutani, Mari
AU - Kato, Motohiko
AU - Sasaki, Motoki
AU - Masunaga, Teppei
AU - Kubosawa, Yoko
AU - Hayashi, Yukie
AU - Kiguchi, Yoshiyuki
AU - Takatori, Yusaku
AU - Mutaguchi, Makoto
AU - Matsuura, Noriko
AU - Nakayama, Atsushi
AU - Fukuhara, Seiichiro
AU - Takabayashi, Kaoru
AU - Maehata, Tadateru
AU - Kanai, Takanori
AU - Yahagi, Naohisa
N1 - Funding Information:
DISCLOSURE: Dr Yahagi; Paid speaker for Olympus, EA Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca, and Daiichi-Sankyo; Advisor to and ownership interest in Olympus; Advisor to Boston Scientific; Consultant to and ownership interest in Top Corporation; Research grant from Kaigen Pharmaceutical and Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Background and Aims: It has been reported that the prophylactic closure of mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic resection (ER) can reduce delayed adverse events; however, under certain circumstances, this can be technically challenging. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the predictors of difficulty during the complete closure of mucosal defects after duodenal ER. Methods: This was a retrospective study of duodenal lesions that underwent ER between July 2010 and May 2020. We reviewed the endoscopic images and analyzed the relationships between the degree of closure or closure time and clinical features of the lesions using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We analyzed 698 lesions. The multivariate analysis revealed that lesion location in the medial or anterior wall (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-5.85; P < .01) and a large lesion size (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.89; P = .03) were independent predictors of an increased risk of incomplete closure. Moreover, a large lesion size (β coefficient, .304; P < .01), an occupied circumference over 50% (β coefficient, .178; P < .01), intraoperative perforation (β coefficient, .175; P < .01), treatment period (β coefficient, .143; P < .01), and treatment with endoscopic submucosal dissection (β coefficient, .125; P < .01) were independently and positively correlated with a prolonged closure time in the multiple regression analysis. Conclusions: This study revealed that lesion location in the medial or anterior wall and lesion size affected the incomplete closure of mucosal defects after duodenal ER, and lesion size, occupied circumference, intraoperative perforation, treatment period, and treatment method affected closure time.
AB - Background and Aims: It has been reported that the prophylactic closure of mucosal defects after duodenal endoscopic resection (ER) can reduce delayed adverse events; however, under certain circumstances, this can be technically challenging. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the predictors of difficulty during the complete closure of mucosal defects after duodenal ER. Methods: This was a retrospective study of duodenal lesions that underwent ER between July 2010 and May 2020. We reviewed the endoscopic images and analyzed the relationships between the degree of closure or closure time and clinical features of the lesions using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: We analyzed 698 lesions. The multivariate analysis revealed that lesion location in the medial or anterior wall (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-5.85; P < .01) and a large lesion size (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.89; P = .03) were independent predictors of an increased risk of incomplete closure. Moreover, a large lesion size (β coefficient, .304; P < .01), an occupied circumference over 50% (β coefficient, .178; P < .01), intraoperative perforation (β coefficient, .175; P < .01), treatment period (β coefficient, .143; P < .01), and treatment with endoscopic submucosal dissection (β coefficient, .125; P < .01) were independently and positively correlated with a prolonged closure time in the multiple regression analysis. Conclusions: This study revealed that lesion location in the medial or anterior wall and lesion size affected the incomplete closure of mucosal defects after duodenal ER, and lesion size, occupied circumference, intraoperative perforation, treatment period, and treatment method affected closure time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110461996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85110461996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.017
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 33930391
AN - SCOPUS:85110461996
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 94
SP - 786
EP - 794
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 4
ER -