TY - JOUR
T1 - Priming With intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation promotes spinal plasticity induced by peripheral patterned electrical stimulation
AU - Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
AU - Fujiwara, Toshiyuki
AU - Lin, Su Chuan
AU - Takahashi, Yoko
AU - Hatori, Kozo
AU - Liu, Meigen
AU - Huang, Ying Zu
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Dr. Jens Bo Nielsen for his helpful comments. A portion of this study falls under the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (Grant No. JP18he0402255). This work was partially supported by a JSPS KAKENHI (C) (Grant No. 26350587) and a Health Labor Sciences Research (Grant No. 12102976) to TF, a grant from the Funds for a Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) (15K16370) and (18K17723) to TY, and grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (most 105-2314-B-182-004-MY3) and the Chang Gung Medical Foundation (CMRPG3F1251) to Y-ZH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Yamaguchi, Fujiwara, Lin, Takahashi, Hatori, Liu and Huang.
PY - 2018/7/24
Y1 - 2018/7/24
N2 - This study explored the effect of corticospinal activity on spinal plasticity by examining the interactions between intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS) of the motor cortex and peripheral patterned electrical stimulation (PES) of the common peroneal nerve (CPN). Healthy volunteers (n = 10) received iTBS to the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle zone of the motor cortex and PES of the CPN in three separate sessions: (1) iTBS-before-PES, (2) iTBS-after-PES, and (3) sham iTBS-before-PES. The PES protocol used 10 100-Hz pulses every 2 s for 20 min. Reciprocal inhibition (RI) from the TA to soleus muscle and motor cortical excitability of the TA and soleus muscles were assessed at baseline, before PES, and 0, 15, 30, and 45 min after PES. When compared to the other protocols, iTBS-before-PES significantly increased changes in disynaptic RI for 15 min and altered long-loop presynaptic inhibition immediately after PES. Moreover, the iTBS-induced cortical excitability changes in the TA before PES were correlated with the enhancement of disynaptic RI immediately after PES. These results demonstrate that spinal plasticity can be modified by altering cortical excitability. This study provides insight into the interactions between modulation of corticospinal excitability and spinal RI, which may help in developing new rehabilitation strategies.
AB - This study explored the effect of corticospinal activity on spinal plasticity by examining the interactions between intermittent theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (iTBS) of the motor cortex and peripheral patterned electrical stimulation (PES) of the common peroneal nerve (CPN). Healthy volunteers (n = 10) received iTBS to the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle zone of the motor cortex and PES of the CPN in three separate sessions: (1) iTBS-before-PES, (2) iTBS-after-PES, and (3) sham iTBS-before-PES. The PES protocol used 10 100-Hz pulses every 2 s for 20 min. Reciprocal inhibition (RI) from the TA to soleus muscle and motor cortical excitability of the TA and soleus muscles were assessed at baseline, before PES, and 0, 15, 30, and 45 min after PES. When compared to the other protocols, iTBS-before-PES significantly increased changes in disynaptic RI for 15 min and altered long-loop presynaptic inhibition immediately after PES. Moreover, the iTBS-induced cortical excitability changes in the TA before PES were correlated with the enhancement of disynaptic RI immediately after PES. These results demonstrate that spinal plasticity can be modified by altering cortical excitability. This study provides insight into the interactions between modulation of corticospinal excitability and spinal RI, which may help in developing new rehabilitation strategies.
KW - Disynaptic reciprocal inhibition
KW - H-reflex
KW - Non-invasive brain stimulation
KW - Presynaptic inhibition
KW - Spinal plasticity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050351069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050351069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2018.00508
DO - 10.3389/fnins.2018.00508
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050351069
SN - 1662-4548
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience
JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience
IS - JUL
M1 - 508
ER -