Prognostic factors after open and endovascular repair for infected native aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery

Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery Database Management Committee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Infected native aneurysms (INAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are uncommon, but potentially fatal. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently been introduced as a durable treatment option, with outcomes comparable to those yielded by conventional open repair. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, the strengths and limitations of each treatment remain uncertain. The present study aimed to separately assess post-open repair and post-EVAR outcomes and to clarify factors affecting the short-term and late prognosis after each treatment. Methods: Using a nationwide clinical registry, we investigated 600 patients treated with open repair and 226 patients treated with EVAR for INAs of the abdominal aorta and/or common iliac artery. The relationships between preoperative or operative factors and postoperative outcomes, including 90-day and 3-year mortality and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection, were examined. Results: Prosthetic grafts were used in >90% of patients treated with open repair, and in situ and extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction was performed in 539 and 57 patients, respectively. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of aneurysm-enteric fistula were independently associated with poor outcomes in terms of both 3-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.62; P =.046, and HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.46; P =.022, respectively) and persistent or recurrent infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.04-4.49; P =.039, and OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55; P =.002, respectively) after open repair, whereas omental wrapping or packing and antibiotic impregnation of the prosthetic graft for in situ reconstruction contributed to improved 3-year survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P =.019, and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P =.014, respectively). Among patients treated with EVAR, abscess formation adjacent to the aneurysm was significantly associated with the occurrence of persistent or recurrent infection (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.06-4.72; P =.034), whereas an elevated preoperative white blood cell count was predictive of 3-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.00-3.13; P =.048). Conclusions: Profiles of prognostic factors differed between open repair and EVAR in the treatment of INAs of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery. Open repair may be more suitable than EVAR for patients with concurrent abscess formation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1379-1389
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Vascular Surgery
Volume79
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024 Jun

Keywords

  • Aortic aneurysm
  • Endovascular repair
  • Infected native aneurysm
  • Open repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors after open and endovascular repair for infected native aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this