TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic factors after open and endovascular repair for infected native aneurysms of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery
AU - Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery Database Management Committee
AU - Hosaka, Akihiro
AU - Takahashi, Arata
AU - Kumamaru, Hiraku
AU - Miyata, Hiroaki
AU - Takahashi, Arata
AU - Miyata, Hiroaki
AU - Azuma, Nobuyoshi
AU - Obara, Hideaki
AU - Miyata, Tetsuro
AU - Obitsu, Yukio
AU - Zempo, Nobuya
AU - Komori, Kimihiro
AU - Zempo, Nobuya
AU - Azuma, Nobuyoshi
AU - Obitsu, Yukio
AU - Shigematsu, Kunihiro
AU - Inoue, Yoshinori
AU - Okazaki, Jin
AU - Obara, Hideaki
AU - Satokawa, Hirono
AU - Sugimoto, Ikuo
AU - Fujimura, Naoki
AU - Hosaka, Akihiro
AU - Mii, Shinsuke
AU - Morikage, Noriyasu
AU - Yamaoka, Terutoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Objective: Infected native aneurysms (INAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are uncommon, but potentially fatal. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently been introduced as a durable treatment option, with outcomes comparable to those yielded by conventional open repair. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, the strengths and limitations of each treatment remain uncertain. The present study aimed to separately assess post-open repair and post-EVAR outcomes and to clarify factors affecting the short-term and late prognosis after each treatment. Methods: Using a nationwide clinical registry, we investigated 600 patients treated with open repair and 226 patients treated with EVAR for INAs of the abdominal aorta and/or common iliac artery. The relationships between preoperative or operative factors and postoperative outcomes, including 90-day and 3-year mortality and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection, were examined. Results: Prosthetic grafts were used in >90% of patients treated with open repair, and in situ and extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction was performed in 539 and 57 patients, respectively. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of aneurysm-enteric fistula were independently associated with poor outcomes in terms of both 3-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.62; P =.046, and HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.46; P =.022, respectively) and persistent or recurrent infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.04-4.49; P =.039, and OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55; P =.002, respectively) after open repair, whereas omental wrapping or packing and antibiotic impregnation of the prosthetic graft for in situ reconstruction contributed to improved 3-year survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P =.019, and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P =.014, respectively). Among patients treated with EVAR, abscess formation adjacent to the aneurysm was significantly associated with the occurrence of persistent or recurrent infection (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.06-4.72; P =.034), whereas an elevated preoperative white blood cell count was predictive of 3-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.00-3.13; P =.048). Conclusions: Profiles of prognostic factors differed between open repair and EVAR in the treatment of INAs of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery. Open repair may be more suitable than EVAR for patients with concurrent abscess formation.
AB - Objective: Infected native aneurysms (INAs) of the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries are uncommon, but potentially fatal. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has recently been introduced as a durable treatment option, with outcomes comparable to those yielded by conventional open repair. However, owing to the rarity of the disease, the strengths and limitations of each treatment remain uncertain. The present study aimed to separately assess post-open repair and post-EVAR outcomes and to clarify factors affecting the short-term and late prognosis after each treatment. Methods: Using a nationwide clinical registry, we investigated 600 patients treated with open repair and 226 patients treated with EVAR for INAs of the abdominal aorta and/or common iliac artery. The relationships between preoperative or operative factors and postoperative outcomes, including 90-day and 3-year mortality and persistent or recurrent aneurysm-related infection, were examined. Results: Prosthetic grafts were used in >90% of patients treated with open repair, and in situ and extra-anatomic arterial reconstruction was performed in 539 and 57 patients, respectively. Preoperative anemia and imaging findings suggestive of aneurysm-enteric fistula were independently associated with poor outcomes in terms of both 3-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.62; P =.046, and HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.12-4.46; P =.022, respectively) and persistent or recurrent infection (odds ratio [OR], 2.16; 95% CI, 1.04-4.49; P =.039, and OR, 4.96; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55; P =.002, respectively) after open repair, whereas omental wrapping or packing and antibiotic impregnation of the prosthetic graft for in situ reconstruction contributed to improved 3-year survival (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.92; P =.019, and HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.32-0.88; P =.014, respectively). Among patients treated with EVAR, abscess formation adjacent to the aneurysm was significantly associated with the occurrence of persistent or recurrent infection (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.06-4.72; P =.034), whereas an elevated preoperative white blood cell count was predictive of 3-year mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.00-3.13; P =.048). Conclusions: Profiles of prognostic factors differed between open repair and EVAR in the treatment of INAs of the abdominal aorta and common iliac artery. Open repair may be more suitable than EVAR for patients with concurrent abscess formation.
KW - Aortic aneurysm
KW - Endovascular repair
KW - Infected native aneurysm
KW - Open repair
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85186719863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85186719863&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.199
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.01.199
M3 - Article
C2 - 38280686
AN - SCOPUS:85186719863
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 79
SP - 1379
EP - 1389
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery
IS - 6
ER -