Prognostic impact of marginal resection for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from 570 hepatectomies

Satoshi Nara, Kazuaki Shimada, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Minoru Esaki, Yoji Kishi, Tomoo Kosuge, Hidenori Ojima

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)


Background: During resection of a hepatocellular carcinoma, surgeons encounter occasionally a situation where marginal resection is inevitable because of a close association between the hepatocellular carcinoma and major vasculature and/or underlying impaired liver function. We investigated the impact of marginal resection on recurrence-free survival after a resection of a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: The data of 570 patients who underwent macroscopically curative hepatectomy for a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in our institution between 1990 and 2007 were analyzed. Marginal resection and non-marginal resection were defined as a cancer-negative surgical margin of ≤1 mm and a surgical margin of >1 mm, respectively. The macroscopic appearance of the hepatocellular carcinoma was classified as the simple nodular type or non-simple nodular type based on the classification of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, and patients were categorized into 4 groups: group A, simple nodular type with cirrhosis; group B, simple nodular type without cirrhosis; group C, non-simple nodular type with cirrhosis; and group D, non-simple nodular type without cirrhosis. Results: The surgical margins were diagnosed as cancer-positive in 31 patients, as marginal resection in 165 patients, and as non-marginal resection in 374 patients. The marginal resection group showed a better recurrence-free survival than the positive surgical margin group (P =.001), and also a worse recurrence-free survival than the non-marginal resection group (P =.003). In groups A, B, and C, the recurrence-free survival rates were similar between marginal resection and non-marginal resection patients (P =.458), while in group D, marginal resection was a significant poor prognostic factor of recurrence-free survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion: Marginal resection is acceptable in group A, B, and C patients, because it did not negatively affect postoperative recurrence-free survival.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)526-536
Number of pages11
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Apr
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic impact of marginal resection for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from 570 hepatectomies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this