Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Proposed a simple score for recommendation of scheduled ultrasonography surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma after Direct Acting Antivirals: multicenter analysis

  • Atsushi Hiraoka
  • , Takashi Kumada
  • , Chikara Ogawa
  • , Kazuya Kariyama
  • , Masahiro Morita
  • , Kazuhiro Nouso
  • , Hidenori Toyoda
  • , Toshifumi Tada
  • , Marie Ochi
  • , Taisei Murakami
  • , Hirofumi Izumoto
  • , Hidetaro Ueki
  • , Shogo Kitahata
  • , Toshihiko Aibiki
  • , Tomonari Okudaira
  • , Hiroka Yamago
  • , Ryuichiro Iwasaki
  • , Hideomi Tomida
  • , Yuji Miyamoto
  • , Kenichiro Mori
  • Hideki Miyata, Eiji Tsubouchi, Masato Kishida, Tomoyuki Ninomiya, Kojiro Michitaka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Aim: To develop a scoring method using with common clinical data for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development after sustained virological response at 24 weeks (SVR24) after treatment with direct acting antivirals (DAAs), we retrospectively evaluated clinical features of patients who obtained SVR24. Methods: From October 2014 to December 2017, 1069 hepatitis C virus patients without a past history of HCC, who obtained SVR24 by DAAs at two different areas, were enrolled (the training [n = 484, ChuShikoku-group] and validation [n = 585, Chubu-group] sets). All were examined by ultrasonography as surveillance for HCC at the time of starting DAAs and twice a year after SVR24. We identified three parameters at SVR24, male gender, FIB-4 index > 3.25, and α-fetoprotein level > 5.0 ng/mL, as risk factors for HCC development and gave them point values, with the sum used as After DAAs Recommendation for Surveillance (ADRES) score. Results: In the ChuShikoku-group, the respective 1-/2-year rates for HCC incidence rates ADRES score 0 were 0.0%/0.0%, for a score 1 were 1.1%/2.1%, score 2 were 8.8%/15.9%, and score 3 were 17.1%/28.1%. On the other hand, those respective scores for the Chubu-group were 0.0%/0.0%, 0.0%/0.7%, 7.9%/10.6%, and 19.5%/not available. The c-index of the predictive value for HCC development in the training set after SVR24 was 0.835 while 0.899 in the validation set. Finally, those of the entire cohort were 0.0%/0.0%, 0.5%/1.6%, 8.4%/13.4%, and 18.0%/32.8%. Conclusion: The present ADRES score was simple and easy to use and may be useful for predicting risk of HCC development in short term after reaching SVR24 by DAAs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)436-441
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Australia)
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Feb
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • direct acting antivirals (DAAs)
  • HCC incidence
  • hepatitis C virus
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • sustained virological response at 24 weeks (SVR24)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Proposed a simple score for recommendation of scheduled ultrasonography surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma after Direct Acting Antivirals: multicenter analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this