TY - JOUR
T1 - Real-world clinical practice for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the very elderly
T2 - A retrospective multicenter analysis
AU - Fukushima, Takahiro
AU - Oyamada, Yoshitaka
AU - Ikemura, Shinnosuke
AU - Nukaga, Shigenari
AU - Inoue, Takashi
AU - Arai, Daisuke
AU - Ohgino, Keiko
AU - Kuroda, Aoi
AU - Ishioka, Kota
AU - Sakamaki, Fumio
AU - Suzuki, Yusuke
AU - Terai, Hideki
AU - Yasuda, Hiroyuki
AU - Kawada, Ichiro
AU - Fukunaga, Koichi
AU - Soejima, Kenzo
N1 - Funding Information:
YO has potential financial conflicts as research grant from Chugai pharmaceutical Co, Ltd (Chugai), as contract from Chugai, AstraZeneca K.K., (AZ), Novartis Japan, Pfizer Inc and as educational events from Chugai, Ono pharmaceutical Co, Ltd (Ono), AZ, Novartis Japan, MSD K.K., (MSD). DA has potential financial conflicts as honoraria from AZ, Taiho pharmaceutical Co, Ltd (Taiho), Pfizer and Ono. HY has potential financial conflicts as lung cancer research grant from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) and honoraria from AZ, Taiho, Nippon BI and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) Japan. KF has potential financial conflicts as research grant from BI, Chugai, Taiho, Ono and honoraria from AZ, BI, Novartis Pharma (Novartis), Sanofi K.K., GlaxoSmithKline K.K. KS has potential financial conflicts as honoraria from AZ, Chugai, Ono, BMS Japan, MSD Oncology, Eli Lilly Japan (Lilly), Taiho, Nippon Kayaku Co, Ltd (Nippon Kayaku), Novartis and as research funding from AZ, Nippon BI and Taiho.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: The optimal treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in very elderly patients is unclear. We aimed to evaluate their treatment in real-world clinical practice and identify suitable therapy that can improve their prognosis. Materials and methods: The medical records of 132 Japanese patients aged 80 years and older with advanced NSCLCs who were enrolled at a university hospital and its 9 affiliates were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and biomarker statuses. Patients were defined as biomarker-positive if programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score (PD-L1 TPS) was ≥ 50% or activating mutations were present in epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or c-ros oncogene 1. Finally, the factors contributing to better prognosis were explored in both PS 0 - 2 and PS 3 - 4 patient groups. Results: The PS 0 - 2 patients showed a longer median OS than the PS 3 - 4 patients (5.5 vs. 1.6 months). PS 0 - 2 patients with positive biomarkers who received chemotherapy showed a significantly longer median OS than those without (18.1 vs. 3.7 months). Among the biomarker-negative/unknown PS 0 - 2 patients, the median OS showed no significant difference between those who received chemotherapy and those who did not (4.5 vs. 3.1 months). The multivariate analysis showed that treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors was related to better prognoses in the PS 0 - 2 group. Conclusion: Biomarker-matched therapy is effective even in very elderly patients. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of chemotherapy for biomarker-negative/unknown PS 0 - 2 patients is questionable.
AB - Background: The optimal treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in very elderly patients is unclear. We aimed to evaluate their treatment in real-world clinical practice and identify suitable therapy that can improve their prognosis. Materials and methods: The medical records of 132 Japanese patients aged 80 years and older with advanced NSCLCs who were enrolled at a university hospital and its 9 affiliates were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared based on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) and biomarker statuses. Patients were defined as biomarker-positive if programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportion score (PD-L1 TPS) was ≥ 50% or activating mutations were present in epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or c-ros oncogene 1. Finally, the factors contributing to better prognosis were explored in both PS 0 - 2 and PS 3 - 4 patient groups. Results: The PS 0 - 2 patients showed a longer median OS than the PS 3 - 4 patients (5.5 vs. 1.6 months). PS 0 - 2 patients with positive biomarkers who received chemotherapy showed a significantly longer median OS than those without (18.1 vs. 3.7 months). Among the biomarker-negative/unknown PS 0 - 2 patients, the median OS showed no significant difference between those who received chemotherapy and those who did not (4.5 vs. 3.1 months). The multivariate analysis showed that treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immune checkpoint inhibitors was related to better prognoses in the PS 0 - 2 group. Conclusion: Biomarker-matched therapy is effective even in very elderly patients. Meanwhile, the effectiveness of chemotherapy for biomarker-negative/unknown PS 0 - 2 patients is questionable.
KW - Biomarker-matched therapy
KW - Cytotoxic chemotherapy
KW - Immune checkpoint inhibitor
KW - Overall survival
KW - Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132162049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132162049&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 35680551
AN - SCOPUS:85132162049
SN - 1525-7304
VL - 23
SP - 532
EP - 541
JO - Clinical Lung Cancer
JF - Clinical Lung Cancer
IS - 6
ER -