TY - GEN
T1 - Reforming an Envy-Free Matching
AU - Ito, Takehiro
AU - Iwamasa, Yuni
AU - Kakimura, Naonori
AU - Kamiyama, Naoyuki
AU - Kobayashi, Yusuke
AU - Nozaki, Yuta
AU - Okamoto, Yoshio
AU - Ozeki, Kenta
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/6/30
Y1 - 2022/6/30
N2 - We consider the problem of reforming an envy-free matching when each agent is assigned a single item. Given an envy-free matching, we consider an operation to exchange the item of an agent with an unassigned item preferred by the agent that results in another envy-free matching. We repeat this operation as long as we can. We prove that the resulting envy-free matching is uniquely determined up to the choice of an initial envy-free matching, and can be found in polynomial time. We call the resulting matching a reformist envy-free matching, and then we study a shortest sequence to obtain the reformist envy-free matching from an initial envy-free matching. We prove that a shortest sequence is computationally hard to obtain even when each agent accepts at most four items and each item is accepted by at most three agents. On the other hand, we give polynomial-time algorithms when each agent accepts at most three items or each item is accepted by at most two agents. Inapproximability and fixed-parameter (in)tractability are also discussed.
AB - We consider the problem of reforming an envy-free matching when each agent is assigned a single item. Given an envy-free matching, we consider an operation to exchange the item of an agent with an unassigned item preferred by the agent that results in another envy-free matching. We repeat this operation as long as we can. We prove that the resulting envy-free matching is uniquely determined up to the choice of an initial envy-free matching, and can be found in polynomial time. We call the resulting matching a reformist envy-free matching, and then we study a shortest sequence to obtain the reformist envy-free matching from an initial envy-free matching. We prove that a shortest sequence is computationally hard to obtain even when each agent accepts at most four items and each item is accepted by at most three agents. On the other hand, we give polynomial-time algorithms when each agent accepts at most three items or each item is accepted by at most two agents. Inapproximability and fixed-parameter (in)tractability are also discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146328697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146328697&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20441
DO - 10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20441
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85146328697
T3 - Proceedings of the 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022
SP - 5084
EP - 5091
BT - AAAI-22 Technical Tracks 5
PB - Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
T2 - 36th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2022
Y2 - 22 February 2022 through 1 March 2022
ER -